Who would win: Hatake Kakashi vs Ichimaru Gin?

2009-02-23 10:23 pm

回答 (18)

2009-02-23 10:48 pm
✔ 最佳答案
Kakashi(besides the argument that he can't fight souls) for a few reasons. He is a strategist, a cache of jutsu that are short/mid/long range, and ninja hounds. Assuming its a fight with only Ichimaru's shikai shown so far(not the unrevealed bankai), Kakashi would only need to worry about the extension of the blade(dodge,clones,substitute jutsu), use his summoning jutsu to have his ninja dogs to immobilize or reduce Gin's agility, and use a long range jutsu that would hopefully be outside the range of Gin's shikai. Also, he could use a genjutsu to affect his mind or go in close for taijutsu to take control of Gin's arm that controls the sword such as in knife defense or a short range jutsu(chidori). His only concern would be trying to match Gin's speed with flash steps and countering kido with defensive jutsu.
2009-02-24 1:07 am
As much as I hate to say it Ichimaru Gin is probably stronger but I don't want to say it so I'll say Kakashi would win!!

yep that's my answer Kakashi Hatake!
2009-02-24 1:24 am
Ichimaru Gin.
2009-02-23 10:32 pm
Ichimaru Gin.....................Definently!!!!! (although I don't particularly care for Gin and like Kakashi, oh well Gin would definently win)
:-D
2009-02-23 10:31 pm
Ichimaru Gin
2009-02-23 10:28 pm
Ichimaru Gin <3333333333
aaahhhhh, he'll beat kakashi!!
2009-02-23 10:28 pm
Ichimaru Gin. XP
2009-02-24 8:22 am
Okay, I am totally in love Kakashi Hatake and I would reeeaalllly want him to win but I just have a feeling Ichimaru would win. I don't know... Gin just seems freakishly powerful but I know Kakashi would give him a run for his money and put up an awesome fight =D
2009-02-24 1:16 am
I love Kakashi but I fear that Ichimaru Gin will win, hands down.
2009-02-26 7:44 pm
KAKASHI HATAKE.
100%.
ALL THE WAY.
HANDS DOWN.
NO DOUBT.
<3
參考: Common sense people. Kakashi will kick yo assssssssss!


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 12:05:47
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090223142326AAab2dY

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份