翻譯~~尋求協助~

Just heard about the defense point of view, I now try to respond to the point of view in order to indicate my support for same-sex marriage.


First, consider the defense of same-sex marriage broke the Chinese tradition, this should not happen. However, I would like to ask, are China's traditional preference for male children and in today's society, this tradition has been broken significantly, this change also definitely not small. However, this is it harmful to society? This shows that the break with tradition not necessarily a bad thing. In the promotion of free love in the modern society, why should not break the tradition of thought, acceptance of same-sex marriage does?


Second, consider the defense of same-sex marriage is a violation of the law of nature. I would like to ask, what is the law of nature? Who is set? Are you not human? May be the defense will say, because animals are one female one male, so this is the law of nature it? Animals are not wearing clothes, that natural law is not the clothes you wear! The dress of human beings, has also been a violation of natural law? That sterilization is also a violation of natural law, why everyone can accept it? Alternatively, the defense that "mammals are breeding to one female to one male to have sex the same," However, this law is the law of fertility problem, and not directly related to marriage. There is no express provision for marriage must be reproductive, reproduction is not to get married before they can.

2009-02-24 00:26:16 補充：
Same-sex marriage think the defense will make the next generation of confusion, so that the next generation of suit. Obviously, this is education.

2009-02-24 00:26:59 補充：
If you want to wander on the topic has been taboo on anything, it will only affect the next generation of thought and ideas, so that our future generations with a wrong understanding of homosexuality.

2009-02-24 00:27:33 補充：
Furthermore, with the legalization of same-sex marriage, like the legalization of soccer betting, soccer betting is legalized is no doubt everyone will be perfectly justifiable gamble surreptitiously without the external, but I do not like football matches, people still go on football matches.

2009-02-24 00:27:59 補充：
Even if the defense think someone will try to play, but I would like to ask, after the legalization of same-sex marriage, you will try to do it gay?

2009-02-24 00:28:45 補充：
Same-sex marriage think the defense will have social problems, exacerbated by the declining birth rate. I think the whole of Hong Kong birthrate is a major issue, which is strong and affluent society trend. This has nothing to do with same-sex marriage.

2009-02-24 00:29:32 補充：
Even if not same-sex marriage legislation, but homosexuality is still exist. Please do not put some form of environmental problem in the homosexual body count indiscriminately.

2009-02-24 00:30:08 補充：
A lot of gay people will have a bias, that is, because not understanding, not only have a bias to accept. We do not use too subjective attitude towards same-sex marriage.

2009-02-24 00:30:41 補充：
The defense can put aside the religious point of view, try to think about other perspectives, to think from their point of view, Landmark-based body to see if they really need. Homosexuals just for their own basic human rights, which have fault?

2009-02-24 00:30:54 補充：
If the defense that this is wrong, I will be ashamed of you.Thank you.

2009-02-24 00:31:40 補充：
記得比多些分我啦!