✔ 最佳答案
The fans were waiting at the airport <hoping to see Jay arrive>.
這個arrive是動詞or what???
我想知這個句子仲對不對如果有兩個verb~~
“Arrive”係動詞,因為放0係see(感官動詞0既一種)後,而感官動詞後動詞要用infinitive/basic form,所以寫“arrive”.
***所謂0既一句唔可以有2個verb,意思係每一句句子都只可以有一個main verb.***呢句只有一個main verb “were waiting”,< >係一個participle phrase,而phrase之內0既see係to-infinitive,而arrive並非main verb,佢都只係infinitive.
=========================
The composition has many mistakes <written in haste>.
這句子中要不要加being在written 之前呢???
如果唔要ge 話written係唔係p.p??
< >內的文字為一個participle phrase,作用係形容/進一步解釋 “mistakes”,文法上可以刪除而唔影響句子結構.
原句係簡化左句子.原本應該係咁寫: The composition has many mistakes <which were written in haste>,刪除 “which were”目的係簡化.“written”係past participle,因為mistakes係唔會自己出現0既,係人為,所以用passive voice. “being written”都係被動,但係就會變成present progressive tense,邏輯上唔成立.d錯處被人見到0個刻,已經被人寫低左(simple past tense),唔會一直被人寫緊(present progressive tense).
=========================
<Having watched TV for over an hour>, she <went> to do her homework.
這一句ge verb 有一個定兩個???
一句句子只可以有一個main verb, “having watched”並非main verb,為左0係句子生存,佢就轉化為present perfect participle.
=========================
Having watched TV for over an hour, she went to do her homework.
是由After she had watched TV for over an hour, she went to do her homework.轉來的,我想知個watched在那句中仲係咪verb定係可有兩個verd 同時存在??
在 “After she <had watched> TV for over an hour, she <went> to do her homework.”裡,呢句有2部份(即係2句子句),而每句子句都可以有一個main verb,所以呢句亦無違反文法.
=========================
放心.英文來來去去都係0個d章法.總之每句完整句子(sentence)或者子句(clause)都可以有1個main verb.如果你有興趣,可以send email同我討論.