Which is the better Super Bowl?

2009-02-02 10:40 pm
After two amazing back to back Super Bowls, I gotta ask, which was better, 42 or 43. I think that 42 had more hype, given the Patriot's perfect season, and that game was an amazing upset. 43 on the other hand, didn't have too much hype, but I think was a better football game.

回答 (17)

2009-02-02 10:49 pm
✔ 最佳答案
Number 43.
2009-02-02 10:45 pm
42
2009-02-02 10:58 pm
42 had more drama the unstoppable patriots offense and the defensive genius of bellichik versus the lack luster blue collar giants. It had amazing plays "the catch" the bomb to boss. the last quarter lead changes.
43 was billed as an ehhh bowl. you had the kurt warner story but nobody really believed the cards would stay in the game. but there they were late in the 4th ready to snatch the hardware from the impenetrable steeler D. lotta penalties though and Harrison should've been thrown out of the game for punching another player while hes down.

As a Giant fan I'm biased but I thoroughly enjoyed this superbowl. Hope you stick around grey beard
2009-02-02 10:54 pm
XLII THE G-MEN did what no other team could do in the reg season and the game was tight all the way thro till the very end unlike 43 where the Steelers pretty much choked in the 2nd half. Can't compare a full competetive game against two lopsided halves
2009-02-02 10:51 pm
42 was definitely not the greatest ever. It was sloppily played, with punts and sacks galore until the final 10 minutes. Thats when it got exciting. 43 at least had a decent score at halftime, and had some semblance of offensive play. 43 was better.
2009-02-02 10:45 pm
42
2016-11-14 9:51 am
sluggish Cooker Superbowl relatively spiced Velveeta Dip a million½ hours 20 min prep substitute to: servings US Metric a million lb Velveeta pepper jack cheese, decrease right into a million/2-inch cubes (popular Velveeta may well be used to tone down the spiciness) a million (14 a million/2 ounce) can ro*tel tomatoes and green chilies (mild or relatively spiced) a million/4 lb browned chorizo sausage a million cup diced broccoli, heated with the aid of yet nonetheless crisp and green a million/4-a million/2 cup salsa, of wanted warmth a million-2 tablespoon warm sauce (non-obligatory) a million sprint garlic powder a million sourdough loaf, hollowed out (or despite the fact which you perfer) --------------------------------------..... Superbowl Chili Cheese Dip 15 min 5 min prep substitute to: servings US Metric a million (8 ounce) kit cream cheese 8 ouncesshredded cheddar cheese a million (15 ounce) can no-bean chili (which includes Hormel) jalapenos, nacho slices (non-obligatory) a million (15 ounce) bag of your renowned corn chips In a small casserole dish unfold the cream cheese calmly all over the backside. suitable with the can of chili. suitable with the shredded cheese. upload as many jalapeño slices as you want. If the youngsters are coming, i will purely suitable 0.5 the dish or leave them out all at the same time and serve them on the area. Bake in a 350° oven till cheese melts, approximately 10 minutes. whilst i'm watching for a crowd, I triple the recipe and placed it in a lasagna pan. I additionally propose Frito's "Scoops" corn chips using fact popular tortilla chips tend to interrupt in this dip. you additionally could make this dip interior the microwave and merely nuke it till the cheese melts. Now that became the least confusing recipe for a celebration or what!
2009-02-02 11:06 pm
I think 42 was easily better with the HUGE world shock and you have the giants, the least expected team to go to the superbowl with the cowboys in the playoffs and the packers were too, but the giants pulled it off and beat the undefeated record breaking so called GREAT patriots, which i hate and loved to see get beaten.plus back to back manning wins
2009-02-02 11:05 pm
i enjoyed both Superbowl's but i will have to say that superbowl 42 was way better to me no team would beat the patriots and the 10-5 giants did now tell me how is that a fluke the giants wanted it more and they was hungry the patriots thought they had that game in the bag u tell me if a team goes undefeated in reg and most of post season and loses to a team no one besides its fans picks to win how is that not a great superbowl even if the cards would have won i still think that the giants beating the pats was way better then steelers cards game u may beg to differ and that's ok.no one expected the giants to win anything and follow up next season with a winning record come on be serious
參考: a new york giants fan
2009-02-02 10:44 pm
I think 43 was better. Think about all of the momentum changes and huge plays. 42 had the story line and the upset, sure, but overall as a game of football, I think 43 was a lot better. It was more thrilling.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 11:59:58
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090202144045AAaGlgb

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份