如果有最低工資 / 最高工時...

1. 工人唔係奴隸，而法例用一個數值去界定權益又是否恰當？
2. 在過去執行強積金，大陸執行勞動法都會引致倒閉，薪金拖欠。薪金如果由經濟理論出發係應該以個人生產力去界定而唔係用一個數值，咁唔止會有爭議，猜疑，最後會引致生產力下降，經濟下滑。
3. 弱勢社群產生是政府政策所致：交通任由公共交通加價，福利以數值而非以物資去維持令致部份被濫用，削弱對其他方面補助。醫療以西葯而非以中草葯為骨幹，大量資源流入外國葯廠，變成本土醫療前線人員資源不足。
4. 利潤無管制，資源可以濫用，浪費成本由市民負擔，物價高漲而令致貧富懸殊，為符合法例便以人頭(Head-count)去控制成本，社會點會唔亂？強權而無法治精神，民望又點會高？成日諗點樣益自己友，搞甚麼副局長、政治助理，民望點止如浮雲？直情去咗外太空，你想睇都睇唔到！
純屬個人意見

The issue with minimum wage is not the issue itself but the entire system.
1. The Labour Department does not have enough resources and authority to enforece a more restrictive labour regulations.
2. Minimum wage can become political bargainning chip easily.
3. Proposed minimum wage can't support the actual living cost.
4. Hong Kong's labour regulations are pro-employer not employees.