法律問題(請專業人士解答，普通人不要憑常識回答)

1. 佢手機確係有春光片, 而且在口供中承認是佢在圖書館拍的, 咁已經夠証據入佢罪. 好難打得甩.
佢無做過, 點解要認? 而且是否在 圖書館拍的其實不重要. 只要睇到段片係喺公眾地方拍嘅, 段片內容亦非一般人嘅道德標準所能接受(例如裙底春光), 而且有可能令一個正常人感到不安嘅, 咁己經可以入罪.
2. 舉証責任在控方. 警方有權決定採用 / 不採用某樣嘢做証物. 所以你唔可以叫警方幫你撿走閉路電視片段.
如果你知道某樣嘢可以協助你嘅辯護, 係有權向法庭申請命令, 檢走閉路電視片段作你嘅証物.
3. 呢單係裁判法院 case, 無錢可揾當值律師幫手, 費用$400. 窮人可申請豁免.
咁簡單嘅 case, 有做刑事嘅私人律師都識做. 費用大約第一堂$8000. 唔方便在此介紹律師, 你自已上香港律師會網頁睇吓.

1) Medium to High Possibility
The bad thing about this case is your friend made a confession. In order to overrule the confession, there must be evidence suggested that the confession did not match the evidence.

Secondly, it will be the evidence itself (the mobile phone). The law authorises law enforcement to search when it deems necessary. But this only includes human. The police did not probably get a search warrant to search an object. (Likewise, a police can't say he needs to search your computer because he "thinks" you have illegal movie in your computer.)

Furthermore, by removing the mobile phone from your friend's possession, it prohibit your friend's right to seek legal advice, unless your friend has been offered to use other phone.

So based on that, your friend has a good chance. But remember, find a lawyer to discuss or use legal-aid.

2) They are not the only one. In fact, if the CCTV can prove your friend's innocence, you can ask the court for issuing an order for the CCTV at the court as evidence.

3) No one knows. The one who used by Nicolas Tse will be a good one.

處理刑事既律師一般都不會平!如果你有法律問題想諮詢律師，你可以在這裡找到一些律師行願意為你免費提供不多於45分鐘的初步法律諮詢。

http://www.choosehklawyer.org/tc/search_fl_practice_areas.asp

在上庭前
現在要做的,就是立即尋求法律意見,找私人律師,,看看警方夠唔夠証據告你,及透過律師幫你同警方據理力爭,否則真的上了法庭就麻煩好多了.

如果無錢找私人律師的話,你仍可去各區的民政署或立法會議員辦事處,要求安排見免費律師尋求意見.

在上庭當日
為保障你的權益及可以繼續得到保釋,你應認真考慮上庭當日,委託私人律師代表你,為你據理力爭.如果無錢找私人律師的話,你在上庭那天早上,去法庭的當值律師服務辦事處,尋求當值律師代表你,為你據理力爭,而當值律師服務的收費為:400元

不要等喇,快去找律師吧!
希望你無事喇!