中国人尊重生命乎？

You brought up a very good question here. Loss of life either through abortion or through death execution is a loss of life by definition. The reason for Chinese government to promote abortion is to control its population. From human's point of view, it serves a pratical purpose. From religious point of view, it is another matter, which I do not want to discuss here.
As to the United States, population growth has never been a problem. Its housing and food supply have never been a problem neither. American calls itself a religious nation. Yet the majority of its Democratic politicians support abortion. To one's greater surprise, most of the Democratic Congresspersons and senates are Catholics. While they are strong abortion supporters, at the same time, they all oppose death penalty to those murders, rapists, ... hard criminals. I hope you would have a better picture about the life issue in the "GREAT AMERICA". The bottom is "America is not that great as one might think.".

將整個中國人與一位美國人來比較人流情況，並不適當。
美國的人工流產多到要在2000年用立法，少女若要人工流產，須通知父母。而中國則未有這樣的法例。因為中國人的道德觀還是較美國保守，中國的人工流產對像主要是有缺憾的或是一孩政策的害處。中國人並不能隨便人流的，一來是技術問題，二來也是道德問題。相比美國，人流技術先進，這所以有大量少女可以隨便人流，連父母也不知道。
美國很多人未婚先孕，這是否基督所教的？
尊重生命而生下有缺憾的人，這的而且確是一個尊重生命的好事，但不能以美國的一例半例來說美國尊重生命喎，美國若尊重生命，就不會到他國發起戰爭，戰爭與尊重生命一定不能劃上等好吧？誰愛到處打別人的國家？
中國至少並沒有去攻打其他國家。誰更尊重生命？

美國尊重生命???

原子彈邊個去炸架???

當時日本都已經用到神風隊, 有去冇回. 大家都知已經就快尾聲.

你話炸一隻廣島都話情有可原. 等日本知到利害. 快D投降啫.

長崎果隻點重邊有理由去炸丫? 前後都冇两日. 就去炸埋長崎.

就算展示威力, 都可以炸落海, 當時係人見到都知冇得揮啦!

為左試爆, 唔理幾十萬人的生命, 重講尊重生命? 痴線!

2008-09-09 17:49:40 補充：
重有呀! 軍隊打軍隊, 食得咸魚抵得渴. 好公道.

而家廣島, 長崎果D係平民咋! 一次過四十五萬平民死咗呀!...美國係痴線架!

美國人是假人道。明知要生個傻仔，也要生下來，其實是害了孩子。如果父母去世，誰來照顧她？也許他們錢太多，花不完，養個傻仔玩下，中國如果十幾億人有十幾萬傻仔，如何生活？很現實的事情，所以我是支持優生人流的。