我想問大家一D關於英文既問題!Thx~

2008-08-13 9:06 pm
我想問關於以下的一條問題:

He is Michael who stands beside chocolate.

解釋係:站在梅旁邊的人是米高。

我想問下這裡為何用who,who不是解誰嗎,但係點解會係呢道用?係唔係有其他意思?

點解唔寫Michael is stands beside May . ?????????

請詳細解釋! Thank you ~

回答 (2)

2008-08-13 9:35 pm
✔ 最佳答案
who 用o黎開頭係問句,如果係 I want to know who... / He asked who... 就係間接問句,呢d情況 who 都係解「誰人」。
但唔係呢兩句情況時,特別係o係句子中間時,who 係一個 relative pronoun(關係代名詞),而由 who 開始o既一句句子,叫做 relative clause(關係子句)。
點寫法?先有兩句:
主句,即句子主要內容:He is Michael.
子句,即補充資料:He stands beside Chocolate.
你想用子句補充 Michael o既資料,就要將子句中 He 變 who(如果係死物就用 which/that):who stands beside Chocolate
然後將子句插入主句,who 要放o係佢代表o個名詞(即 Michael)之後,咁就變成:
He is Michael, who stands beside Chocolate.
紅色係主句,而藍色係子句。如果主句講o既事情好清楚,如好似呢度咁有名,咁我話唔話你知佢旁邊係 Chocolate,你都知佢係 Michael,咁呢句叫做 non-defining clause(非界定子句),即係有冇都得,主句同子句之間應該有個 comma(所以我加左),如果子句係插入主句中間,則要前後有 comma,總之就係主句同子句俾 comma 分隔。
但如果當時有三個 Michael,咁有呢句子句o既意思,你先知係講緊邊個 Michael。如:
This is the one who helped me last week.
呢種叫做界定子句(defining clause)中間唔會有 comma。
明未?
圖片參考:http://tw.yimg.com/i/tw/ugc/rte/smiley_4.gif

= = = = = = = = = = =
Michael stands beside May. 意思同上句唔同。呢句只係講述一個簡單o既事實:「Michael 企o係 May 身邊。」
但上面o個句,其實係想講「佢係 Michael」,再加補充。
2008-08-13 9:31 pm
呢個可以話係一個relative clauses 。
relative clauses 係指補充一樣野。

你呢一句都可以寫成 :
Michael, who is standing beside May.

relative clauses:
如果你係補充一樣物件,你就要用that / which
如果你係補充一個人,你就要用who
仲有一點要特別注意,就係係專有名詞後面要加 comma
e.g Michael

至於,你問點解唔寫成Michael is stands beside May.
首先,你呢句grammar錯左,
應該係 Michael is "standing" beside May .
但係,呢一句野同果一句係有些小唔同既。

首先,Michael, who is standing beside May. 呢一句,
佢主要係想講比你聽Michael係邊個,
所以先講比你聽佢係企係May既旁邊。

但係,Michael is standing beside May . 呢一句,
佢係主要講比你聽Michael企係May旁邊既意思,
並唔係補充緊Michael係邊個。

呢d就係分別喇。

who 的確係解 "誰",
係relative clauses,佢都係解誰,
不過只係唔用於問的方式。

希望可以幫到你啦! ^^
參考: 沒有啊!


收錄日期: 2021-04-12 14:01:31
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080813000051KK01209

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份