巴哈與韓德爾的作曲風格有甚麼分別?

This is only my personal opinion (so don't answer like this in the exam!)
I have just put on Concerto No.3 1st mov. - it's very different to any of Handel's music, in a sense that this mov. sounds a lot more ridge. Listen to how the beats come in, very 'dead-on'. It's a very German Baroque style, timing is strict, the melody comes around and around in different tones and keys but the basic structure is still largely unchanged. It gets to a climax that isn't 'over-the-top', very tamed.
You could be forgiven for mistaking The Brandenburg No.5 as Handel because it does sound lighter than most of Bach's music. However, the timing is still very strict - the melody comes around and around. Not too much fancy things.
Now listen t Handel's Water Music and Royal Fireworks - the melodies varies a lot more and so does the tempo. Most importantly, the melodies are much lighter than Bach's, especially listen or the 1st violin sections - the bow is lighter on the strings. Good example would be 'The Arrival of th Queen of Sheba'. The climax os Handel's music is less tamed than Bach's. There are also a lot more ornaments used in Handel's music.
One VERY important difference between Bach and Handel - Bach wrote music for the church; Handel wrote for the English court! So Bach's mucic sounds more solemn than Handel's. Handel also travelled alot more than Bach and was influenced by different styles includng Italian. Bach stayed in Germany for most of his life.
Hope that's answered your question.

巴哈和韓德爾都是巴洛克時期的作家，所以風格相近。巴哈的作品復調比較多，主題在幾個聲部出現。韓德爾的作品單旋律的多些，用和鉉，巴哈用復調。

巴哈嘅歌比較齊整,而且幾複雜,但係數拍子就吾難

而韓德爾嘅歌就比較溫和,多用和弦

希望幫到你=)

根據我的樂理先生，Bach(巴哈)的作品較複雜，Handel(韓德爾)較多和

弦。我想大致上差不多。


至於有冇其他分別就唔知啦。