”due to” vs ”because of”

意思相同，但有學者認為用法有別。
因為 because of 用法如 adverb（即 adverbial），修飾o既係動詞。
e.g. He made the decision because of his girlfriend.
但 due to 就傳統以來被視為一個形容詞，即係佢應該係以 be due to o既形態出現！同一句例子用 due to，就要改寫成：
His decision was due to his girlfriend.
但係，多年來愈來愈多人將 due to 用作 adverbial，界線開始含糊。不過追本逐源，就應該用 be due to。呢個分別仍然有文法學家堅持。
你日後用 due to 唔加 be，人地當唔當你錯，只係睇你遇著乜o野人。穩陣起見，加 be 一定唔會錯。事實上即使用 because of 套入上句：
His decision was because of his girlfriend.
文法依然無錯。

Hi, I do not find any difference between due to and because of both in :
Meaning : on account of, by reason of, for the purpose of
Usage : no difference
Example :
- I cannot go to your party due to my sickness
- I cannot go to your party because of my sickness
- John’s result is better than me due to his good basic knowledge.
- John’s result is better than me because of his good basic knowledge.
Please let me know if you think otherwise.

1) 基本上用法一樣。
2)example 是名詞 唔可以咁講 你的句子有錯!

你可以講 explain with example/instance



i am not sure about their usage <--唔太明你想表達咩 你想講 你唔知點用?

你應該講 i am not sure how to use them.