Sony A350 v. A300 + Tamron A16 v. A18 (Philip Please in)

2008-07-31 7:04 pm
i have read most of the answer from you.

you have mentioned if budget is around 6k - 7k, these will be a good choice ?

1) i want to know whats the main difference / advantage of A350 compared with A300 ?

2) where can i buy for A300, coz everywhere is selling A350 ??

3) whats the difference of Tamron A16 and A18 ? i just know one is from 17-50mm and 18-250mm....... what are they use for ? what about the focus ?

4) i mainly use for taking sights and potriat... what will u suggest me ? double kit lens not gd, what about 1 kit lens ? or juz body + A16 ?

many thanks to you all. i am new to DSLR want to buy my FIRST one ! =]

回答 (1)

2008-07-31 10:45 pm
✔ 最佳答案
A300有機身防震,可以反mon既quick live view.價錢又唔貴,其實係好適合一般人用的.
如果只係買套裝,四千幾就搞掂,就算加鏡都只係七千幾.
1).A350同A300最大分別就係像素同連拍速度.A350係1400萬像素,A300係1000萬像素.不過計我話像素咁多反而唔好,一來好小機會用到,二來雜訊控制會差咗.三來會增加記憶卡負擔同拖慢連拍速度,所以A300既連拍速度係快過A350的.A300係每秒3幅,A350係每秒2.5幅.
2).A300缺貨啦,Sony網頁都有講,要買就要等下.
3).A16同A18係兩支好唔同類型既鏡頭.
A18主要賣點係高倍變焦加埋稍大的放大率影埋近攝,以方便為大前題,唔駛帶咁多鏡.但代價就係光學質素較一般,光圈細,對焦慢.
A16買點就係恆定大光圈同良好既光學質素.缺點當然就係焦距較短.光圈大入光量多,取景會較明亮,對焦快較快.
4).睇翻你要影既題材,我會建議A300加A16.A18係方便,不過你影既嘢唔係太需要長焦距,不如在常月焦距做好啲好過.A300雖然有防震,但係A18光圈細令快門變快,變相減低咗手持能力,低光時你會發覺好難用較長焦距手持,但A16有恆定光圈,不單對防震有幫助,涷結主體動作快較好.唔太高要求,50mm配合f2.8光圈影半身人像的話都有一定淺景深.反之A18光圈細就要zoom到好遠做淺景深,較為不便.
不過好遺憾,A300暫時係冇淨機身賣的,反而A350就有,最起碼要買埋17-80mm支kit lens.支Kit lens老實講真係認直麻麻,雖然收下光圈都唔可以接收既,但用起來限制就比較多.
有一樣要留意,Sony係冇好似Canon同Nikon咁有支六百零蚊既50mm f1.8,只有一支二千幾蚊既50mm f1.4,你如果要玩好淺景深既人像相就要預呢筆錢.
Sony網頁有兩部機既規格
http://www.sonystyle.com.hk/ss/product/alpha/index.jsp
以下網頁有鏡頭測試
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/overview
以下網頁有鏡頭大約價錢.
http://www.ygdragon.net/
玩魚眼可以考慮Sigma 15mm f2.8,不過要留意,Sigma鏡Sony mount好多時都係冇現貨的,好大機會要店舖幫你向Sigma攞貨.
1000D係Canon新出既入門級DSLR,規格比450D低會價格更具競爭力.規格其實同A300差不多,不過就小兩個對焦點,live view拍攝速度比較慢,但閃燈同步速度就比A300快小小,有1/200秒,A300係1/160秒.
套裝已經包埋一支18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS防震鏡頭,光學質素比Sony嗰支好.但係Canon冇機身防震,買又有大光圈又有防震既鏡頭會頗昂貴的,這一點要注意.
魚眼方面,Canon自己有一支15mm f2.8,Sigma嗰啲都可以用,一定有Canon mount,仲多過Sony.

2008-08-01 19:33:18 補充:
我覺得咁,由於單鏡機一買就買晒成個系統,日後要轉會唔見好多錢,所以要先清楚自己之後的方向.
如果單計kit set,其實A300同450D唔會差好遠.買邊部都冇所謂,450D支鏡靚小小,閃燈同步快啲,同埋最緊要係Canon頂級產品多,日後你想玩好high都得.
A300支鏡差小小,但有反mon quick live view同平啲,最緊要係有機身防震,日後加鏡可以慳錢啲,唔計50mm f1.8,因為Sony冇呢支鏡.

2008-08-01 19:33:42 補充:
舉個例,你可能玩一輪唔鐘意支kit lens,A300的話用$2800買支A16就大光圈防震兼備.450D的話一係就用六千幾蚊買EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM,一係就買A16不過就冇咗防震.遲下想玩下長焦大光圈,A300用$5500買支Tamron 70-200mm f2.8又係大光圈防震兼備,Canon就要用一萬三千幾買EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM先有防震.

2008-08-01 19:33:56 補充:
之但係如果你係追求完美既,你又可能會鐘意上面嗰兩支貴鏡喎.因為佢地有超聲波對焦.L鏡仲會有螢石鏡片.轉過頭你可能追求速度連機都換埋,咁Canon 40D有9點十字對焦,每秒6.5幅連拍,呢啲就算Sony A700都冇.
做個總結,如果錢係問題,建議都係買Sony A300啦,最多哽咗支kit lens,唔鐘意先換.
如果你係完美主義又願意之後用多啲錢既,咁買450D會好啲.
Sony A300 kit set約$4590
Canon 450D kit set約$6380


收錄日期: 2021-04-13 15:53:49
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080731000051KK00790

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份