請問一些生字問題

2008-07-13 5:22 pm
一般字典說 xx的 例如 decided 是明確的 ,而字典的詞性是顯示 a.

是什麼意思? 我用的是字典軟件,但查了兩天都不知 以該生字估計 應

該是形容詞 如果是 我又很混淆 因為 這和過去分詞又是否一樣? 但

過去分詞不是只可用在受詞的前面嗎? 因為我在報章見到這個字是

"....execrises decided to...... " 這句的其他字忘記了


謝謝回答
更新1:

上面的 decided 應該是 designed 假設過去分詞不是形容後來的受詞,而是用在被動語態,但這例子又不是,如果是解作 運用已預先設計好的,請問這個Designed 是什麼詞在這例子?都是叫過去分詞 還是形容 詞,還是其他

回答 (2)

2008-07-14 12:24 am
✔ 最佳答案
一般字典說 xx的 例如 designed 是明確的 ,而字典的詞性是顯示 a.

a.意思 : 指該形容詞須直接置於所修飾的字詞之後。
例:
 (正) the president {elect}
 (誤) the elect president
Yahoo字典軟件 has definition on every 詞性. You have to look at the definition to understand.
For your information some 字典軟件 use different words to describe詞性. The most correct one should be a normal dictionary. If you look at the normal dictionary, “designed” = adj. = adjective.

So "....execrises decided to...... " is correct according to 該形容詞須直接置於所修飾的字詞之後

Some 形容詞 和過去分詞是一樣, some are not.
Past participle same as past tense, example :

Present past past participle continuous

Work worked worked working

Play` played played playing

---

Past participle different from past tense – we also call this Irregular verbs, example :

Present past past participle continuous

Do did done doing

Go went gone going

Sing sang sung singing

---

The following is a web site where you can find all the irregular verbs :

http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/grammar/unreg_verben1.htm

過去分詞不是只可用在受詞的前面嗎? Yes
Here “designed” 解作運用已預先設計好的. 在這例子Designed 是形容詞.
Some verbs can be changed to adjectives when we use a past participle. This kind of adjectives are usually use to 形容 people’s feeling or something 已預先設計好的
參考: Myself
2008-07-13 5:33 pm
你可以下載聰明筆。 希望幫到你啦。
參考: Yahoo下載的!


收錄日期: 2021-04-24 10:41:06
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080713000051KK00518

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份