Technical Analysis?

2008-07-06 2:17 am
When I started investing I admittedly didn't have a clue what I was doing. I was very impulsive and didn't do nearly enough research. At the time, fundamental analysis was all I understood and I barely understood that.

Over the years (5 or so) I've been bitten by the technical analysis bug. I love technical analysis. It seems to me, a person could be a very successful investor on technical analysis alone.

How do you guys feel about that? Is that an accurate statement? With minimal fundamental analysis and lots of technical analysis can a person invest successfully? Or would that be considered more "trading" vs. "investing?"

回答 (10)

2008-07-06 3:20 am
✔ 最佳答案
Technical Analysis is a great compliment to fundamental analysis. However, by itself, above average market returns are not sustainable through technical analysis alone.
2008-07-06 4:00 am
Yes, I think it is more geared toward trading than investing as others have said.

It is another tool.

I didn't believe in it much until I learned to see some patterns that did repeat. Being a chartist is a little different than "technical", a part of it. But I think many of the followers tend to look too hard and ignore big factors in favor of the technical conclusions.

I like to look at moving averages and Bollinger bands. They can give you an idea if over a period of time, a stock or stocks are under or over the "average" value.

But it can lead you astray as well.

For example if Israel attacked Iran and oil shot to $200 a barrel, all the technical and even the fundamentals would say BUY as the market would be going in the toilet.

Or take the internet bubble where the prices of stocks blew through all technical and fundamental levels and continued to do so for years.

One big problem with technical and even most fundamental analysis is that the data is all trailing, history, past performance.

And what you need to know (guess at) is the future.

In the end you still need to come to some personal conclusion as to WHY the data is the way it is to make a decision where a stock may go.

Investing is not solely a numbers game as much as we like to try to reduce it that.

Good Luck
2008-07-06 3:39 am
I always use both technical analysis and fundamental here is my take on it.

1 Technicals always outweigh everything.

2 Technical work much better for short term trading which is not bad.

3 Fundamentalism is more long term geared.

I do not think you need to use fundamental analysis but if you are using technicals to invest with you might want to look at a bigger chart.

EX. 5 year chart with weekly intervals.
2008-07-06 6:49 am
Technical Analysis from my viewpoint is nonsense. According to Warren Buffet, the only thing that matters is finding a fundamentally sound company with reasonable prospects selling at a price that affords an investor a good margin of safety, by selling below its intrinsic value. In other words a price quotation should only be a reference point to compare with what you "value" the company to be - if it is lower then you should consider an investment if it is higher then it is speculation.

Momentum trading and trend chasing is a wreckless way to manage your money. As with other things in life, following the herd never tends to take you in the right direction - avoid being a lemming and focus on sound analysis and common sense.
參考: Professional Investor
2008-07-06 2:26 am
I believe that your last statement is more accurate then the rest. It is sometime more accurate to say "speculation" vs "investing/trading".

From my part, I do not think that any of them alone is sufficient to be a good investor. I use fundamental analysis to decide on portfolio allocation and strategy and I use technical analysis for market (entry/ exit) timing.
2016-04-08 9:17 pm
It actually isn't a fact that it works, all academic studies have shown it to be generally ineffective, many famous investors such as Buffet have said that it's ineffectual for them. There's nothing wrong with using past performance to gauge future performance but many technical analysis techniques have no basis and many people who use technical analyst ignore the fundamentals behind the tools they are using. The true weakness is that many analysts simply don't understand what they are doing with technical analysis and just follow a lot of buzzwords instead. Here's a question for you, since you are using fibonacci ratios? Why would fibonacci ratios be pertinent?
2014-09-23 7:39 am
Hello,
You should try with Penny Stocks Trading (you can find more info here: http://pennystocks.toptips.org )

Penny stocks, also known as cent stocks in some countries, are common shares of small public companies that trade at low prices per share.
I've been subscribing to this PennyStock web site for about a year now and have loved the objective advice they give. He really does look for quality stocks and I've made some pretty nice profits on a lot of his suggestions. Being still fairly new to investing I have been dabbling a lot in penny stocks to try and grow my account. I may not have a big account, but it's a lot bigger than it was a year ago. On just one of Nathan's picks this year I managed to make my investment back ten-fold! Be careful! Penny stocks are notoriously risky but if you follow the right method the risk is almost 0. I suggest to invest only little money first and then reinvest the profits. This is the site I'm using: http://pennystocks.toptips.org
2008-07-06 3:41 am
2008-07-06 2:33 am
I trade options, I don't invest. So using that as a precursor, I dislike technical analysis mainly because it is very easy to say 'oh I know why the stock price went up; it's is because you see a head and shoulders before volume ramped up'. Hindsight is great but I can't buy into it. I use very basic indicators like moving averages to determine when to buy or sell. And I try to use trailing stops or other measures to get out if I am wrong.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 16:11:00
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080705181702AAcXZtP

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份