我有個朋友揾咗份司機工做。返工第二日就撞車。其實開工前，他已發覺架車有問題。他同主管講，主管唔理，要他繼續開工。點知真系出事。當時並無人受傷。我朋友即時call個主管，問要唔要報警。主管竟然叫他快D離開現場。我朋友聽他話走咗。公司之後自己拖架車去相熟車房維修，然後寄信claim我朋友成萬五蚊。果架只系一架有20年車齡的爛貨車。點睇都唔似甘貴。我朋友唔賠。而家公司入稟小額錢債告我朋友。請問是否合理？應該點同個官講？贏面有幾大？
PS 撞車當日我朋友就辭咗職。
交通意外責任
2008-06-19 12:07 am
回答 (2)
2008-06-23 7:06 pm
如果能證明你朋友於意外發生時，是因為受僱而鴐駛此汽車，則這一個案不能交由小額錢債審裁署去處理，因為這祇是僱主向僱員追討損失，屬於勞資糾紛，正確應該由勞資審裁署審理！
根據僱傭條例，「僱員因為疏忽或失職而損壞或遺失僱主的貨品、設備或財產，每次祇可按值賠償，但以不超過$300為限」。
你朋友應該盡快聯絡勞工處《勞資關係科》作出申訴，由勞工處通知小額錢債審裁署，並將個案轉介至勞資審裁署作出處理。
根據僱傭條例，「僱員因為疏忽或失職而損壞或遺失僱主的貨品、設備或財產，每次祇可按值賠償，但以不超過$300為限」。
你朋友應該盡快聯絡勞工處《勞資關係科》作出申訴，由勞工處通知小額錢債審裁署，並將個案轉介至勞資審裁署作出處理。
2008-06-19 12:57 am
do not worry. just tell the judge the truth. the judge can tell who is right and who is wrong. i do not think your friend should be responsible for this.
if you friend does not agree with the company or if he has any loss from that incident, I think he could even 提出反申索 to claim his loss from the company.
of course, the best and safest thing to do is to consult a proper legal advice.
i believe in justice!
if you friend does not agree with the company or if he has any loss from that incident, I think he could even 提出反申索 to claim his loss from the company.
of course, the best and safest thing to do is to consult a proper legal advice.
i believe in justice!
收錄日期: 2021-04-19 17:06:23
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080618000051KK01607