@@我想問一條好百痴的問題

1.好坦白同你講美國...因為軍事好講腦力同財力,美國兩樣都有
晒,中國差一樣,就係腦力(錢佢唔係冇但係難聽D同好坦白講用
財不當)
好簡單一個比較,人地美國可以1000架M1A2你中國得唔得?你99
式1000架都唔知有冇(同埋人地美國係1比1 QC,中國?)
同埋你如果有睇Discovery果D過時節目(Future Weapon)就知美軍
玩緊咩野,中國?唔係唔得的睇佢際遇...
2.唔洗講中國...因為睇地圖就知...
(兩個唔同世界,當你美軍出動總軍力打中國,你當中國13億人流
架?一日游擊一個你都死)[除非你美國真係好似蘇聯咁屠城就另
計]
3.同上,美國,因為中國冇咁的能力打到去美國
(因為美國有一個完善的network,你未上到岸都死九成)
(除非中國搵激光射爆太空D衛星吧)

the military power also based on money power, sourse, materials power, man power, technology, manunfactures power......
for example, in last couple years--06 and 07, USA had lost 800,000,000,000 from natural disater demages. not even included the 200,000,000,000 each year spent in Iraq war yet. but we have not much effected by the money the country lost. our daily life still as same as usual..... so, do i answer your first question?

USA come fight inside China heartland is dead end, same as China go into America.

actually these 2 countries will not flight directly. they will use other smaller country as war stage. it already happening in somewhere now.

1.美國軍費支出和軍備比中國勁!
2.和3.核彈發明後,未有兩個擁核國家發生戰爭;所以這個真是如果題,假設性問題比較難答,但韓戰和越戰的結果應該對問題發案有點啓發!

你的問題一點都不白痴, 仲講著一個道理出來.

講軍事實力, 中國一定沒有美國強. 科技,武器,財力中國都比美國差好遠. 就好似一個武功高的人同一個武功低的人, 大家的實力差好多, 在擂台上比武當然武功高的人勝

但兩個人如果係摶命呢? 邊個會死?? 咁就好難講la. 武功強人的去武功弱的人的地頭, 唔一定會有著數, 相反呢, 武功弱的人就係找死.

所以, 武力唔係決定你勝負的唯一因素, 唔係有power就大哂. 做人都一樣, 唔係你有武力, 人地就會買你怕的