✔ 最佳答案
just some rough ideas:
1. Tibet is an ethnic and politcial entity independent from the dynasties of China until the 17th Century, when the Qing Dynasty of China acquired the territory by force.
2. Tibet has enjoyed relevative degree of autonomy under nominal Chinese sovereignty despite the series of power succession in Mainland China throughout the centuries.
3. The Communist governent, after consolidating its rule in Mainland China in the 1950s, sought to put Tibet under its control. The Chinese "liberated" Tibet in 1959. A treaty was signed with the intention to maintain relative autonomy of Tibet under the Chinese rule.
4. Tibetian opinion towards Chinese rule was divided, along the line of sectarian and social differences. The dominant sect "Gelukpa", led by Dalai Lam, found the Chinese rule unacceptable to Tibet in many aspects. After a failed revolt, Dalai Lama and some senior members of its sects went into exile in India.
5. The Chinese government should be criticised for its policy in Tibet in some aspects, specially the horror and violence that has threatened the religious life of Tibetians during the height of political movements in the 1960s. After the economic liberation in the 1980s, some ideological grips have been relaxed and life of the general public improved, though not without challenges like the conflict of interest between the Chinese migrants and Tibetians, and the fear of capitalist contemination in the region.
6. It is hard to say if the Tibetians are demanding "independence". Even Dalai Lama's sect claims that they were only demanding "autonomy". The sentiments of people in Tibet are even more complicated. It may be fair to say that the general public does not object Chinese rule and they welcome the improvement in living standards but they would like to see some conflicts between the Chinese and Tibetian ways of life be tackled more fairly to them.