✔ 最佳答案
good:
- open trade between countries, improving choices and quality of goods, better living standards.
- third world developing countries (namely transitional economies) need a lot of savings in order to develop further. Hot money flows from foreign firms and investors are very important. This also intend to be an injection into the economy stimulating aggregate demand.
- foreign businesses set up firms to take advantage of cheap labour force would also increase employment.
- more foreign direct investments and employment lead to higher consumption, which form a positive multiplier effect upon the economy which again increase income ...etc
- More culture/entrepreneurship that improves the skill/motivation of existing residences. It also brings better technologies into the production process which increase potential and actual output.
bad:
-Hot money flows are only good when they are stable. i.e. they are not injected and being taken away very soon which actually cause economic fluctuations. Like singapore in the 1990s.
- Most income are brought back to foreign countries (high GDP but low GNP) but nevertheless employment rate as well as domestic income increase.
- negative externalities - as you have said, many production process would harm the environment.
- More trades result in more choice, but on the other side of the coin it has inevitably increased competitions within industries which, third world countries with less productivities (due to lack to technology etc) may have less advantage on. This results in an increase in import but decrease in export, causing trade deficit, which also depreciate its currency.
According to the Harrod-Domar model growth = S/K where S stand for savings and K stand for capital. Increasing savings would higher growth rate.
There are quite a few different explanations by different growth models, but i don't think you should talk about them in detail.
hope it helps.