✔ 最佳答案
I cannot prove K exists, but in fact, I have found a way to draw ABCDE in which K does NOT exist:
The question statement does not state that all internal angles are smaller than 180deg. Imagine ABDE forms a square while BCD is a reflex angle (like an M with a closed bottom)
AD, being the diagonal of the square ABDE, is still the longest diagonal in ABCDE.
In this case, no K can possible be located on AD within the bound of A and D which satisfies:
I) BKA less than 90deg
II) BKC less than 90deg
III) CKD less than 90deg
at the same point.
Points to satisfy I) are located on AD between the mid-point and point D
Points to satify III), however, are located between the right-angle projection of point C on AD and point A.
The ranges of points to satisfy I) and III) do not overlap.
The statement can therefore never be proven generally true if evidence to the contrary can be found. Not unless the statement itself is inaccurate or incomplete, e.g. there are no reflex angles.
2008-04-05 06:01:11 補充:
Can't understand why there is still universal proof if a contradictive case can be found...