軍服一問(真品問題)

2008-02-05 7:25 am
我想問下現時市面上標示為「真品」既軍服係唔係真係現役軍隊既真品定係仿制
如果真係現役軍隊既真品咁係點樣流到出市面出售(d國家唔係應該會同供應商有協定唔可以將呢d野流出市面既咩?)
更新1:

唔明...可唔可以用中文答

更新2:

回二樓咁姐係果d真係真品,但就係次貨黎?

回答 (2)

2008-02-05 9:34 pm
✔ 最佳答案
先唔講來源,因為所有「真品」都係屬於該國家嘅「財產」,理論上係唔比公開發售嘅,但事實係好大部份市面買到嘅軍用品係以「到期」或「不能修復」為藉口;由管倉嗰班老友,成車成櫃咁運走!
就小弟所知,一般軍服、夾乸衣、醫療用品及 MRE 等所謂「消耗品」不論狀況;出入香港都係唔受限制嘅,只要無喺香港法例 Cap.60 嘅清單內被列入受管制戰畧物資就可以。
出咗倉嘅嘢就通常會被接頭買手成批拍賣,假若你係軍用品鋪買手;好彩就成櫃新嘢運走。唔好彩就成櫃真係報銷品,蝕晒都無仇報!
得意嘅係你可以喺美國買到英國或加拿大嘢,但無本土美國嘢買!相反在英國亦好容易買到美國嘢。好簡單,賣本土嘢犯本土法例嘛,挪去第二處買鬼理你咩!

2008-02-06 12:58:24 補充:
嗱,軍隊係國家機器嘅一份子,為保障國內就業機會,傳統上所有軍需品都必需係國內生產。所以唔好比人誤導咗你,嗰啲同你講係甚麼次貨或者由別國代為生產嘅,我話你知其實係賣假嘢嘅藉口。首先,所有次貨都唔會交到軍部,因為唔合格嘛。生產商怕唔怕下次無得做先?第二,真係次貨嘅話,生產商自己嘅 QC 己經抽起晒並進行銷毀,成本其實一早加咗喺合約內。最後,生產商嘅 QC 重「盡忠」過軍部管倉班友,呢個係鐵一般事實!所以,你要知要學嘅,並唔係怕買到「次貨」;因為係唔會有次貨流通呢件事,而係識得睇喺件軍品上印嘅合約批號同生產商 Label 資料。
2008-02-05 5:31 pm
Military uniforms are made by civilian contractors. For each bulk order, there might be surplus that you can find in most retail stores. Trival quantities of military equipment could be the result of indiviual military serviceman that sold his / her army issued items to the public for cash, then report lost to quartermaster for re-issue.
In certain circumstances, military equipment such as uniform might be rejected by army due to defects, these items have nowhere to go except to the civilian collectors.
When I was in Seoul, I traded with a GI for his kvelar, boots, gas mask and webbing for only US $200........hehe.......very cheap.......

收錄日期: 2021-04-23 21:08:50
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080204000051KK04015

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份