M92F vs M1911

我就認為1911好好多
M9唔係射人唔得
只係佢用的彈頭同1911不相同
Stopping power不足
而1911就係用.45彈頭
重量十足
我記得1911的彈頭係史上手槍最重的
所以Stopping power當然高好多
而且1911襟用
例如海豹部隊用M9個陣
經常拉槍膛滑架
結果有一次槍膛滑架”走火”
彈中一個海豹部隊塊面
海豹部隊即刻停用M9
仲出左一句名言：
”如果你沒有吃過意大利鋼（指M9槍膛滑架”走火”事件，仲係成日個隻），那你就不算是一個海豹隊員”
邊支好
你自己衡量啦下

如果你指stopping power呢樣係睇你用咩子彈咩彈頭,
好似用鉛彈咁入肉之後開始溶個stopping power就會比銅彈頭入肉之後仲成形既大.
好似有o的彈頭入肉會散開咁stopping power亦係超高.
而9mm點解話好用就係因為... 冇咁易射穿人(好似)
(冇咁易流彈傷及無辜)
咁.45口徑大o的, 後座力亦強o的,
冇咁易用就應該既.
不過玩氣槍我就prefer 1911, 因為o岩手型,
槍呢家野真係好似車咁, 前七對法拉里你未必會揀法拉里,
o岩用至為緊要.

I have a different idea. Colt is a good man-stopper; could deliver a huge punch. Beretta complies with modern miliatry concept that : "Wounding a foe is better than killing one"
In the battlefield. I wish I were shot by a Beretta but I prefer carrying a Colt.....hehe.....