SURVEY: Would you kill one person to save a thousand?

2008-01-29 3:12 pm

回答 (15)

2008-01-30 12:42 pm
✔ 最佳答案
In a strategy game like, Warcraft, yes.

In real life how would you convince me, that this is the only option. How am I to kill. Are there two buttons, one marked,
one, the other one thousand. Do I have to chase him down with a big stick & club the life out of him, because someone said, thats him there, get him. I am not a mercenry, I don't want, causeing suffering, to be my intent. So, it's a big ask.
Who is the one, have they already saved, ten thousand.
Is it my own child. Is it someone universaly despised.
My answer is I could, I don't know if I would.
Sometimes I feel like I could kill, just for cutting me of in traffic.
So catch me in the right mood, I'm your man.
It just wouldn't sit well with me, for the rest of my life.
2008-01-29 3:17 pm
No, i'll burn those money and save their life. I'm not a money-minded.
2008-01-29 3:18 pm
If i had to kill one person to save a thousand..
I'd kill myself.
I can't kill anyone else, regardless of whomever they may be
2008-02-05 6:26 am
Yes and I`d do it again in a heart beat.
"The meek shall inherit the Earth", because a few brave men saved them from Satan`s horde.
2008-01-31 6:09 am
that would depend on a few factors:
is the person I'm going to kill good or bad? how bout the people I'm trying to save?
if the people I'm going to save is just a bunch of immoral person, better have one immoral person than a thousand.
2008-01-30 1:24 pm
Save thousand people i would save and billion thousand dollars also i would save but only a thousand dollars i would not save
2008-01-30 5:02 am
yes
2008-01-29 3:38 pm
yes
2008-01-29 3:30 pm
No, unless I'm in the military or police force.
2016-12-10 10:03 pm
i could like some examples the place substitute has definitely happened from interior of a rustic. there may be some, yet they're oftentimes a reaction to assist from exterior. Even the fall of a few minor soviet republics in straightforward terms happened because of the fact the régime grow to be moribund and greater than a number of alternative surrounding countries had already replaced. The Islamic worldwide is in contrast to this. Oppression is stored afloat by stealthy cultural conditioning. The tribal 'cultural norms' subsumed into Islam should not be secure by so-stated as 'religious freedom'; this is disingenuous to even call it that. Cultural relativism reasons human beings to instruct an unwitting blind eye because of the fact they're terrified of admitting a complicated reality: Islam won't stop its deeply-rooted mediaeval techniques without exterior impact and a flush of recommendations which will oppose it.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 10:09:13
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080129071247AALzZNG

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份