Chem: inflammable and flammable

2008-01-14 12:38 am
What is the difference between 'flammable' and 'inflammable'?

Are they the same? If yes, any one of them is more 正統?

When we talk about the property of a substance (i.e. can be ignited), which one should we use?


Thanks a lot~

回答 (1)

2008-01-14 4:32 am
✔ 最佳答案
The following is the explanation:

Linguistics: Flammable vs. inflammable
圖片參考:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Wiktionary-logo-en.png/50px-Wiktionary-logo-en.png
Look up flammable, inflammable in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. The word "inflammable" came from Latin inflammāre = "to set fire to", where the prefix in- means "in" as in "inside" (compare English "in flames"). But there have been instances of people thinking that this "in-" prefix means "not" as in "invisible" and "incombustible" etc, and thus wrongly thinking that "inflammable" means "cannot burn". To avoid this safety hazard, the shortened word "flammable" has come into use in recent years.
(The French for "non-inflammable" is ininflammable, with a negative in- plus an in- meaning "inside".)
The Elements of Style ("Strunk and White"), on the other hand, says:
Flammable. An oddity, chiefly useful in saving lives. The common word meaning "combustible" is inflammable. But some people are thrown off by the in- and think inflammable means "not combustible." For this reason, trucks carrying gasoline or explosives are now marked FLAMMABLE.


收錄日期: 2021-04-19 22:22:13
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080113000051KK02601

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份