gun don't kill people kill, but gun make people more easy to kill , am I right?

Not really. If someone was inclined they could use virtually anything as a weapon, from a knife to a pencil.

It depends on what you are trying to say.
If you are arguing: Firearms make killing easier. The question is: Easier than what?

If you are arguing: Firearms make killing easier, then they should be banned. Then you are trying to debate a point.

The underlying theory is anything that makes killing easier, is bad. However, any tool that is misused / abused can be used to make killing someone easier.

As Magpie identified, a pencil can be used to kill a person. Her point is: Does that mean pencils should be banned?

Here is the common counter-argument: Vehicles don't kill people, but vehicles make killing people easier. Is that logical?

Substitute whatever you want in there. It can be kitchen knives, screwdrivers, toothbrushes, video games, violent music, alcohol or whatever.

It does not stand up to any type of logical analysis. It is fallible, and therefore faulty.

Actually, if you really wanted to kill people, a can of gasoline and some matches, along with any crowded area without fire sprinklers would be a lot more deadly.

The main purpose of guns is to keep the government from getting too pushy.

Did you ever THINK how easy it would be to run over a group of people with a car ? Or a playground full of children ? Car don't kill people, but car make people more easy to kill, am I right ?

Nope. If someone wants to kill, they can use anything.

People have killed each other long before guns were invented, To say the gun was the one who committed the act is like blaming the messenger for bad news.

I agree with magpie. People kill People.

i thnk the first one was better

Yes. How many people would the Columbine Killers, the Virginia Tech guy etc. have killed without a gun?

i'm no American but US government has some serious problem.No offence but you guys call that freedom or right of property but thats such a stupid mind-set. It is true that less guns less crimes with gunshot. If they call them right, why don't they have right to posses granade or some sort of mass-destruction weapons?