急急急急急急急急急急翻譯英交高手請進thx

2007-12-05 1:46 am
中國經常宣傳日軍如何殘暴地逼害殺害中國人,而且整個二戰歷史只集中在塑造和加強日本人的邪惡面,可是,到底整場戰爭怎樣打、由誰去打?這些部分的着墨很少。當然,與政治問題有關。總而言之,只灌輸一個中心思想,日本人對我們的先人十分殘酷,身為中國人,應該永遠記住這段仇恨,日本人是永遠欠我們的。
  在每年二戰紀念的活動裏,日本着眼點都放在記念廣島原爆、東京大轟炸一類事件上,亦不斷告訴後代太平洋戰爭肇始於美國的石油封鎖,為了生存才逼不得已偷襲珍珠港。他們處理侵略歷史的手法,只懂突出日本人怎樣地受苦,怎樣地悲慘,怎樣被列強欺負。
比較了兩國處理同一段歷史的手法,兩者都是放大自己的慘況,從中在兩者之間取一個道德高地,然後不斷重覆又重覆地自說自話,不看看別人的意見,選擇地張揚某種有利於建立高地的資料。然而,即便如此,日本人也做得比中國人要好,最少別人死了誰都有名有姓地記錄下來,中國那所謂三十萬南京死難者,全都面目模糊。
所以說,兩國思維極之相近,真不明白為何現在鬧得如此不快。

回答 (2)

2007-12-05 1:52 am
✔ 最佳答案
How does China propagandize the Japanese forces to compel the evil frequently to kill the Chinese cruelly, moreover the entire two war history concentrates is only molding and strengthens Japanese's evil surface, but, how entire does the field war attack, hits by who? These parts of inkings are very few. Certainly, concerns with the political issue. In brief, instills into a central thought only, the Japanese is very brutal to our ancestors, the body is a Chinese, should forever remember this section of hatreds, the Japanese forever owes us.
  Two fights the commemoration in every year in the activity, the Japanese objective point places commemorates Hiroshima to explode, Tokyo to bomb at greatly originally a kind of event, also unceasingly tells the descendant the Pacific War to initiate in US's petroleum blockade, to survive only then compels to have to sneak attack Pearl harbor. They process the history of aggression the technique, how understands the prominent Japanese to suffer hardships only, how pitiful, how to be bullied by the big powers.
Compared with both countries processing identical section history's technique, both enlarge their tragic situation, took a moral high ground between both, was unceasingly redundant repeatedly speaks one's mind, did not have a look at others' opinion, the choice to make widely known some kind to be advantageous to the establishment high ground material. However, even if so, the Japanese also does is friends with compared to the Chinese, least others died everybody to record well-known, the Chinese that so-called 300,000 Nanjing victim, the appearance was all fuzzy.
Therefore, both countries thought is extremely close, did not understand really now is why noisy so not quickly.
2007-12-06 4:19 am
老實講,對呢篇文o既觀點不敢苟同,但亦睇唔過眼呢d翻釋網站o既所謂英文,因此有此一譯:
China has always promoted the cruelty of the Japanese Army towards Chinese people in its propaganda, and has focused in its WWII history only on shaping and reinforcing the evil of the Japanese. However, little has been mentioned about how the war was fought and who fought it. That, of course, was due to political considerations. All in all, (its WWII history) is based on the theme of emphasizing the Japanese's cruelty to our people and we, as Chinese, should never forget this enmity and that the Japanese are forever indebted to us.
In the annual WWII memorial service, Japan has always put its focus on incidents such as the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and the bombing of Tokyo. Their post-war generations have been fed that the Pacific War started from the sneak attack of Pearl Harbour in which Japan had no choice as it struggled for survival as a result of America's oil embargo. The way they manipulated the hitory of their invasion emphasized the suffering and hardship of their people and how they were humiliated by international powers.
Comparing the ways the two countries tells the same period in history, what is in common is that their own suffering was magnified for claiming the moral high ground, which is strengthened by claims repeatedly made without considering opinions from other points of view, and information selectively publicized. Nevertheless, the Japanese have done it better than us by at least recording the names of every victim, while the 300,000 killed in the Nanjing Massacre, as is claimed by China, are still nobody.
As it is, the two countries are not so different in their mindsets and it is hard to comprehend how their relationship can become as difficult as it is today.

收錄日期: 2021-04-19 14:13:06
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071204000051KK01876

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份