請幫我翻譯以下一段英文

2007-09-23 12:30 am
請幫我翻譯以下的一段中文譯作英文。

愛護動物團體建議將虐畜的最高刑罰由現時入獄五個月及罰款五千元,提高至入獄五年及罰款五萬元,逾六成受訪市民贊成這建議,認為凡有傷害生命的刑事行為,也應要換來判處入獄的後果,才能大收阻嚇之效。另有兩成七受訪市民認為虐畜這條條例是五十年代的產物,因此很應該修改,至於把最高刑罰增加多少,則要另行商榷,也不應一下子增加太多。


THX~

回答 (4)

2007-09-26 3:34 am
愛護動物團體建議將虐畜的最高刑罰由現時入獄五個月及罰款五千元,提高至入獄五年及罰款五萬元,逾六成受訪市民贊成這建議,認為凡有傷害生命的刑事行為,也應要換來判處入獄的後果,才能大收阻嚇之效。另有兩成七受訪市民認為虐畜這條條例是五十年代的產物,因此很應該修改,至於把最高刑罰增加多少,則要另行商榷,也不應一下子增加太多。

The loving care animal association suggested is put in prison for five
months the oppressive livestock's highest penalty by the present and
fines 5,000 Yuan, enhances to is put in prison for five years and
fines five ten thousand Yuan, the exceed six tenths are visited the
resident to approve this suggestion, thought every has the injury life
the criminal behavior, also should have to trade the result which
condemns to be put in prison, can greatly receive anti- frightens the
effect. And some two tenths seven receive visit the resident to think
oppressive livestock this rule is the 50's products, therefore very
should revise, as for increases the highest penalty how many, then
must separate discuss, also should not increase all of a sudden too
many.
參考: Yahoo!奇摩搜尋語言工具
2007-09-25 3:31 am
SPCA groups propose to cruelty to animals, the maximum penalty is imprisonment for 15 months by a fine of 5,000 yuan and raised to five years imprisonment and a fine of 50,000 yuan, more than 60% of the respondents in favor of this proposal, that all life has hurt the criminal acts should also earn sentenced consequences can be a deterrent effect. Another 20% of respondents seven people that cruelty to animals of this Ordinance is a product of the 1950s, so it is should be amended, the maximum penalty for the increase, it must be open to question, and should not increase too much at once.
2007-09-23 12:52 am
SPCA proposed that the maximum penalty against cruelty to animals should be raised from an imprisonment of 15 months and a fine of $5,000 to an imprisonment of 5 years and a fine of $50,000. More than 60% of the respondents were in favor of this proposal and agreed that it would achieve a deterent effect only if the criminal acts of hurting animals would result in being sentenced to imprisonment. Another 27% of respondents opined that the ordinance of cruelty to animals was a product of the 1950s so it should be amended for the increase in the maximum penalty, and the amount of the increase should be open to discussion and should not be too much.

2007-10-05 13:46:04 補充:
a no. of grammatical mistakes
參考: Myself with reference to google translate
2007-09-23 12:33 am
The loving care animal association suggested is put in prison for five months the oppressive livestock's highest penalty by the present and fines 5,000 Yuan, enhances to is put in prison for five years and fines five ten thousand Yuan, the exceed six tenths are visited the resident to approve this suggestion, thought every has the injury life the criminal behavior, also should have to trade the result which condemns to be put in prison, can greatly receive anti- frightens the effect. And some two tenths seven receive visit the resident to think oppressive livestock this rule is the 50's products, therefore very should revise, as for increases the highest penalty how many, then must separate discuss, also should not increase all of a sudden too many.
參考: 俾個網你..吾好再問喇=]http://babelfish.yahoo.com/?fr=bf-res


收錄日期: 2021-04-23 21:21:40
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070922000051KK03085

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份