我想買canon40D，支KIT鏡好唔好

17- 85 f4-5.6 IS USM我覺得其實幾好.焦距好用又有防震.17mm對一般wide shot來講好夠,再wide其實會開始難控制,係較為進階的玩法,只係光圈細小小,不過實有好多器材友會話支鏡點唔好點唔好.佢地眼中只有L鏡先合格,一定會叫你買17-40 f4L.甚至有人會叫你買定焦.
問題係係咪用咗L鏡啲相就一定靚先?實在見到太多用17-40L做鏡頭蓋既人腳架唔用,外閃唔用,有乜唔夠光就iso 800, 1600咁用,一唔係就由得佢手震,同追求畫質根本背道而馳,似追求器材多啲.你如果自問唔係呢啲人,你真係可以考慮下17-40 f4L的.
我心水係Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS USM,雖然焦距短小小,但係起碼畫質唔可以再話唔得,光圈又大,已經平過初出既時候好多,值得買.
副廠就有
Sigma 18-50 f2.8 macro,畫質好好,價錢平過17-40 f4L,又大光圈,又有macro,不過冇防震.
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 macro,畫質都好,焦距好用,價錢平,又有macro,不過光圈細,冇防震
Tamron 17-50 f2.8,畫質好,價錢平,但對焦面不是平面,影平面嘢要收到大約f8四角先清.同埋冇防震
以下是各支鏡頭的review.
大約價錢可以睇呢度
http://www.ygdragon. net/index.php?page=p hoto/cameraprice.htm

Canon 17- 85 f4-5.6 IS USM
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ canon_1785_456_is/in dex.htm

Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS USM
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ canon_1755_28/index. htm

Canon 17-40 f4L
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ canon_1740_4/index.h tm

Sigma 18-50 f2.8 (非macro版)
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ sigma_1850_28/index. htm

Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 macro
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ sigma_1770_2845/inde x.htm

Tamron 17-50 f2.8
http://www.photozone .de/8Reviews/lenses/ tamron_1750_28/index .htm