巡邏警員的問題

警察不是軍人。
放諸世界﹐警察的主要角色是維持社會的法治和平穩﹐好像英國那樣﹐巡警平時是不配槍的﹐他們的角色是市民的朋友。
即使在香港﹐警察配槍主要是為了“增加他們的說服力”﹐如非必要﹐也不會動用槍支。
軍人需要的﹐除了是使用重武器和作戰的技能外﹐更重要的是要服從﹐所以你見到軍人永遠也是小組行動的。
相對起來﹐警察很多時也需要自己一個處理很多問題﹐即使可以呼叫增援﹐但是在增援來到之前﹐自己也要(其實是所有人也期望他)能夠把場面控制住﹐警員的訓練也因此而偏重於在法律之下解決問題的能力﹐而不是武力的使用。

聯合國是以“國家”為會員標準的組織﹐因為香港不是“國家”﹐所以不能夠直接參與聯合國的維和任務。況且﹐維和部隊是聯合國派往“曾經發生戰亂”的地方﹐去“觀察和平進程”(而不是去“強制和平進程”)﹐面對的可能是敵對各方的“軍事組職”﹐一般警察去到只會“送死”而已。

2007-08-01 16:43:09 補充：
說到增援﹐如果遇到問題所講的情況﹐警察可以叫SDU增援﹐SDU曾經受英國SAS特種部隊訓練﹐他們的訓練比較著重於武力的使用了。非不得已﹐還有駐港解放軍可以請出來增援﹐可是到那時候﹐對手可不是單純的“受過軍訓的人”﹐而是“敵方軍隊”了…

2007-08-01 16:43:36 補充：
不論是香港還是西歐各國﹐警察的日常任務﹐用到武力的機會不會多﹐要動用到火力的更加少。要讓一般巡警同時懂得法律﹐解決問題的方法﹐和“軍隊級”火力﹐戰術﹐是不可能的。因此針對一般巡警的需要﹐只教他們基本的火力﹐戰術﹐讓他們在一般情況下用得著﹐再另外教一小部份人(香港SDU﹐美國SWAT﹐英國SAS﹐德國GSG9等等)“軍隊級”火力﹐戰術﹐讓他們處理重火力事件好了。

你依個問題其實係講side啦,
你連law都有=.="地雷又有=.="
其實警察D訓練咁勁都冇用,就算有又點?
左輪加後備先12飛,唔係叫佢用黎打cover fire呀!
不過你咁講我咁答,
香港SDU成就英軍SAS訓練,
打依D都應該OK既,
反正香港咁多人,軍用武器反制本身就不是考慮
所以依家SDU都OK啦!

不過,我對你句補充好反感!

Your question is a little bid too far. `Police received training for law enforcemnt, not military operation. Soldier received training on military skills, tactics etc.......totally different from police work.
Of course, certain field between police and military overlapped. But it doesn't necessarliy means that a police shold receive training to dealt with heavily arm, para-military mobs.
In HK, we still have PLA to backup police force during insurgency, there is no need to worry. Moreover, elite units of the police force such as AU, PTU and SDU is among the world's topmost elite force. There is no situation that police force could not handle.
On the contary, the so called para-military mobs you mentioned were only in the films.....in the real world, its one in a million that a peaceful society like HK that might be attacked by such group.
Hk government has monitoring system on internal affairs. You should have confidence on our system and the most important.......watch less movies and play less TV games......good luck!