hay....do u guys believe in Mary virgin birth????

Nothing is impossible. Yet, noone can proof how a Pyramid was built (by human, without any machinary) thousands of years ago. There should have had some super hi-tech which hadn't been documented. The Bible also recorded visit of "angles" in the Old Test. and other unexplainable evidences that Jesus did in the New Test. So, there is a possibility of virgin birth.

2007-07-02 12:28:48 補充：
Mircles are evidences that simlply something you "believe it or not". If an evidence is proven, it's no longer a mircle.

2007-07-02 12:29:42 補充：
Changing water to wine is also considered a mircle. If you really want to explain it, it involves a series of chemical changes (I guess) and again, it's still unexplainable without significant information.

2007-07-03 04:05:32 補充：
barbarianthegreat: You don't have to SEE oxygen to proof that it exists. It is not very wise to have experience or actually SEE something in front of you to believe a fact.

2007-07-03 04:06:59 補充：
I don't think you are not very good at Physics, as you can't really SEE the whole universe or you probably can't SEE an atom or nuclear breaking down to create energy.


2007-07-05 08:59:26 補充：
,.. well, if you really have to have some proof of God's existance, I don't. But I can't find any proof about God's in-existance neither...

2007-07-05 09:00:33 補充：
.. There should be a creator, since everything is planned so perfectly. Nothing would happen by coincidence, maybe just out of human wisdom's limit.

根本《聖經》就充滿流料，例如四福音書中就只有《馬太》及《路加》兩本有耶穌出生事蹟，連最早的《馬可》都沒有，而兩本福音之間矛盾嚴重（例如《馬太》版本的約瑟本來是伯利恆居民，《路加》版本的約瑟本來是拿撒勒居民），起碼有一本是捏造，再加上兩版本都與歷史不符兼情節荒謬，唯一可能性是兩本福音都是老作！

耶穌出生「記載」的兩個版本：
http://*****/5zqoy2

又例如新約預言公元一世紀世界末日（已徹底破產接近二千年）：
http://*****/6dg8st

無數落空預言：
http://*****/5wb2ez
http://*****/ywtg53