大家來做測試

事實上，愛因斯坦是否曾經參加過智商測試是值得懷疑的，因此他的智商能力是在去世後被估計的。

　　這些評估方法之一，是一九二六年Catharine Cox（「天才的遺傳基因研究」的作者，斯坦福大學新聞系）所發展的理論。她的理論以法國精神病學家Binet（ＩＱ測試的發明者）的衡量法為基礎，而且主要用來衡量已故的人的ＩＱ。這個方法是通過調查一系列的歷史記錄包括學校的記錄，書面的記載，和科學相關的主題的研究，甚至調查有啟迪作用的軼事而研究出來的。

　　因此，她的研究就可以使我們能夠確定那些在過去的四個世紀裡的著名的哲學家，作家和科學家的ＩＱ水平。以後經過一些大學的組織的更正和研究，兩位德國人佔據了最高的成績﹕文學家和學者歌德擁有188的ＩＱ成績，被認為現代邏輯學之父的哲學家Leibniz擁有183的ＩＱ成績。Cox同時也發現不同領域擁有不同的ＩＱ水平和成為天才的標準。她給出了以下的描述（在掛號中的是樣本的數量）﹕哲學家（22）平均ＩＱ是173，科學家（39）平均ＩＱ是164，小說作家（53）平均ＩＱ是163，政治家（43）平均ＩＱ是159，音樂家（11）平均ＩＱ是153，藝術家（13）平均ＩＱ是150，軍人（27）平均ＩＱ是133。

　　愛因斯坦的ＩＱ，也是在他去世後通過相近的程序測量出來的，並且顯示出他的出眾的成績高於160分（大約在162分），這也就是為什麼說他是一個天才，但是他依然還是遠遠落後於超長智力的階級，比如歌德和Leibniz。

───────────────────────────────────

　　以下一段英文文章，較詳細地講到具體測量已故人士智商方法，包括調整方法和實驗數據等資料：

The Cox IQ data were taken from column 25 "Corrected IQ estimate"; "AII" of Table 12A in Volume II: The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses by Catharine M. Cox from Genetic Studies of Genius edited by Lewis M. Terman. Copyright 1926, Stanford University Press. (Data taken from the third printing January, 1959. I have seen no evidence that the Cox study was ever revised past 1926.)

The Intelligence Quotient scores are on the Stanford-Binet scale. The scores listed are based on biographical data (including school rankings, anecdotes, works written, etc.) from data up to 26 years of age (and corrected to counter a regression towards the mean).

According to Cox, "The correction attempted in the present report is a crude approximation...: it indicates a point below which the true IQ probably did not fall." and "The resultant approximations are probably in most cases still too low, and perhaps, in a few cases, a trifle too high. The final correction is thus no more than an approximation to a true score." .

With a study this old, the Flynn Effect has to be taken into account if one wants to realistically compare one's IQ score with that of the people on the list. IQ tests have had to be revised several times. The average score is always supposed to be 100. But as time passes, new generations start to get higher scores on the older tests. There are various hypotheses to explain this including improved nutritional and environmental factors. The Flynn Effect numbers are given on a 15 point standard deviation scale (the Stanford-Binet uses 16 S.D.). Depending on the developed country, there is a steady IQ gain of 5 to 25 points per generation (30 years), with a median of about 15 points. (James R. Flynn, Massive IQ Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure, Psychological Bulletin, 1987, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 171-191. For more details click here.) This means that perfectly average modern kids have gotten 'genius' scores on old IQ tests.

The gains are not just for average people. For example, looking at a Dutch 1952 IQ test given to 18 year old military recruits, 0.04% got scores of 150 and above in 1952, whereas in 1982, 2.27% achieved that level. The ratio is 57 to 1.

Now, specifically for the Stanford-Binet Test (in the U.S.), there has been a gain of about 0.3 IQ points per year. This is lower than the approximately 0.5 median gain for other IQ tests in other developed countries. Converted to the corresponding 16 S.D., the gain is 0.32. To make the correction we can calculate the effect from 1916 to the year 1986 (years of the original and current versions of the Stanford-Binet test). So the calculation is (1986-1916)*0.32 =22 IQ points, if rounded.

2007-07-06 13:15:06 補充：
這個網頁十分有趣具有創作性!!!!

好玩！！
大家IQ分數有幾多?
唔話你知！
大家認為有幾大參考性?
ｏｋ！

2007-06-28 19:54:13 補充：
大家來做測試!好玩！！

iq一般到16歲以上就不准確了，比如
一個人非常的聰明但是他不 認識字 ，難道就説明他很笨 麽？
iq測試和自己的知識積累也有關係的。
平常人 的iq是115--135之間