荷蘭兩大名宿列卡特同朗奴高文誰打防守中場較好???

唔... 兩個都係後衛黎架喎, 不過我覺得兩個都好適合打防守中場, 朗奴高文被稱為重炮, 成四十碼的罰球都可以好勁咁射入, 後上助攻或遠射都好勁; 而列卡特就比較全面, 又夠硬朗, 而且被稱為荷蘭三劍俠之一實力真係好強, 後上射門都得, 所以真係好難取捨, 不過都要睇下有咩隊友配搭架, 因為中場好講體能同機動力, 而後衛就要安於本分少啲助攻穩陣, 所以我諗都係列卡特打中場而娃娃臉朗奴高文打後防會好啲。
另外講到球員職業生涯我諗最好一定係球王比利啦, 依家上網睇返佢啲片都覺得佢係癲架, 想防佢就唯有作出犯規動作, 可想而知佢一攞波就比到對方幾大壓力, 實力真係超班, 而且球品好, 又無咩唔好的新聞, 加上依家咁老仲可以係足球上有好高的成就, 真係無嘢好講。
之但係講到荷蘭球員的話就非荷蘭球王告魯夫無屬啦, 剩係睇打winning除咗龍門外適合任何位置就已經無其他人可以相比, 全能足球係佢身上真係表露無遺, 加上球技了得同得獎無數, 又係無嘢好講。

2007-06-22 10:27:08 補充：
哎呀... 我係誤會咗你個問題呢? 其實你係咪想問列卡特同朗奴高文兩個邊個職業生涯較好呢? 如果係咁... 我覺得其實兩個都係好, 不過列卡特就永遠都會有個污點係度, 就係佢同德國的禾拉吐口水果單嘢, 永遠都忘記唔到。

In my own opinion, if only count on their ability in performing as a DM, I'd definitely give the vote to Rijkaard.

Of cuz both of them used to play as DM for their corresponding team (Koeman for PSV & Rijkaard for Milan). Both player had very good natural fitness, positioning, passionate, leadership, defensive insights, etc., but Frank's physical build-up was even better than Ronald's. However, Koeman's long shot ability was world class, which was something lacking in Rijkaard.

Remember 90 WC? Rijkaard was put ahead of Koeman by the coach as the DM of Dutch. So it should have told you who performed better in DM. And even his brother, Erwin Koeman, played better as a midfield than Ronald.

While both of them had bunches of silverware on their neck, I'd rather say Rijkaard posessed a better career than Koeman (so subjective though I admit). At least when we talked about the Classic Netherlands, people always came across Cruyff, Van Basten+Gullit+Rijkaard, Neeskens before coming to the ranks of Koeman brothers or De Boer brothers.

列卡特,,
因為佢係打過防守中場!!