超廣角鏡冇用武之地

2007-04-16 5:04 pm
我用Canon EOS 400D,正考慮添置超廣角鏡(Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM 或ToknaTokina AT-X 28-70mm f/2.8 287 Pro SV ),但我個friend阿支阿左,說我很少出外旅遊,而香港本土又沒有什麼地方需要用上超廣角鏡,因此沒有需要購買。 

由於超廣角鏡價錢不低,Cannon $4880(不連遮光罩),Tokina$3480(連遮光罩),請問拍友有何意見?(按:我呢個friend算係個攝影盲毛)

回答 (3)

2007-04-16 5:37 pm
✔ 最佳答案
ToknaTokina AT-X 28-70mm f/2.8 唔算係超廣角鏡呀,只係標準range大光圈鏡...
我都唔影風景,不過我都有支 Sigma AF 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM 超廣角鏡,
一般人都覺得超廣角鏡只係羅黎影風景,其實不一定,用超廣角鏡影室內,
你會得到好似o的樓宇雜誌效果,我羅黎影自己屋企發覺屋企忽然大o左好多,哈哈...
而羅超廣角鏡影近o野會得到誇張效果,呢兩處都係好玩地方,而小弟用超廣角鏡主要係近影飛機,好似車展或航空展等好多人會圍住架車或飛機,當你想影晒成隻時用一般鏡要行到好後,咁會影到好多人入鏡,近影或影唔晒,咁超廣角鏡就有作為了...
下面為小弟用Sigma 10-20mm 影的相,不是風景


圖片參考:http://www.aeroplux.com/temp_post/A380_27.jpg



圖片參考:http://www.aeroplux.com/temp_post/A380_23.jpg



參考: self
2007-04-16 5:53 pm
咁又唔一定要超大景先可以用超廣角鏡既.即使就咁對住條街影,超廣角出來既感覺同普通廣角鏡感覺係唔同的.
有部份人誤會超廣角就只係影多啲咁解.其實超廣角會令近的物件變得很大,遠的物件變得很小.所以不是垂直物件拍攝的話,會令物件歪斜非常嚴重,雖然其他廣角鏡也會,但超廣角會非常誇張.我自己不太喜歡這種感覺,所以滿足於18mm的鏡頭.至於Tokina配400D焦距會不夠廣角,28 x 1.6變了44.8mm,唔好用.
2007-04-16 5:32 pm
"香港本土又沒有什麼地方需要用上超廣角鏡"? Your friend is really a 攝影盲毛. Maybe he/she doesn't know what is 廣角鏡!?

If you shoot landscape, wide angle lens is good to have, but not a must. What is the "widest" lens do you have now and do you think it's not wide enough for your need? If yes, you may want to get a wide angle lens. Use your creativity, wide angle lens can be more than just a landscape shooting lens.

By the way, Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 is not a wide angle lens for EOS 400D. You should look at Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X Pro DX.


收錄日期: 2021-04-13 16:38:03
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070416000051KK00687

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份