有關冷戰 Berlin Blockade & Cuba Crisis 10 點

2007-04-03 9:20 pm
我想問點解穌聯放棄 柏林封鎖和古巴導彈

回答 (3)

2007-04-11 12:43 am
✔ 最佳答案
係柏林封鎖個到,
穌聯知道再爭持落去都冇用嫁喇
美國用飛機運物資去救左個柏林喇
穌聯再封個結果都一樣,就冇謂浪費氣力軍力喇

至於古巴飛彈
因為當時美國個態度勁硬!
佢地一定要穌聯放棄
美國也同穌聯講如果你折左佢,美國都會折番幾個導彈
咁穌聯一方面都驚原子彈,
另一方面,接受美國既建議又冇害
加上個陣時點都要有一方讓步呀麻
2007-04-13 2:19 am
The Soviet Union lifted the Berlin Blockade, to a large extent because of the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in April 1949. The NATO signatories agreed that an attack against one member would be considered as an attack against all. The Soviet Union dared not to challenge all the Western European countries and the US. Therefore, she lifted the Berlin Blockade.

In fact, the Berlin Blockade was costly; the Soviet Union would be able to see that the West could not support West Berlin for long. She had no sympathy towards the West Berliners.

As for the Cuban Missile Crisis, it was only a test on President Kennedy's ability. Kennedy was the youngest US president in history; he was also the first Catholic president. Khrushchev wanted to test if the US would be weakened under Kennedy's leadership. However, Kennedy's stern attitude surprised the Soviet Union. Because of fearing a total nuclear war with the US, which would destroy the whole world, the Soviet Union had to back down and withdrew the missiles from Cuba.
2007-04-03 10:52 pm
1)蘇联領導人赫魯曉夫提出和平共存政策,一反史太林既作風
2)蘇联和美國都知道核彈既威脅,而蘇联也知自己既軍事力量不如美国
3)美国在這兩件危機中均採取强硬既態度,美國視這兩件危機為蘇联擴張其共產主義.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 00:15:22
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070403000051KK01442

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份