在沒有民主政治選舉的香港：
「港人治港」是否官商不分？
「京人治港」是否比較客觀？
參考資料：
http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/oslojou
「港人治港」還是「京人治港」比較好？
2007-03-21 12:41 am
回答 (5)
2007-03-23 3:18 am
British 治港 is the best !
British are the 1 st managers .
Chinese are hard working employees !!
British managment + chinese hard working = 1 st class international city (HK).
British are the 1 st managers .
Chinese are hard working employees !!
British managment + chinese hard working = 1 st class international city (HK).
參考: ME
2007-03-21 7:59 pm
當然是港人治港更好啦,最起碼香港人較清楚香港的需要,且親身體驗,
不過現在香港是(一國兩制),雖常稱說港人治港,高度自治,是否能做到高自治,本就覺得不值一提,因為凡是抉擇大事也是暗中受中央牽制,牽着鼻子走;(其實是京人治港至真)
不過現在香港是(一國兩制),雖常稱說港人治港,高度自治,是否能做到高自治,本就覺得不值一提,因為凡是抉擇大事也是暗中受中央牽制,牽着鼻子走;(其實是京人治港至真)
2007-03-21 3:17 am
港人治港比較好.
河水不犯井水.
河水不犯井水.
2007-03-21 12:44 am
Hong Kong is best!
收錄日期: 2021-04-12 21:23:48
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070320000051KK01982