please翻譯英文

Instead, "Apple Daily paper" the standpoint similarly is also bright - - however I to believe this is positive. Every time brings forth the parade, mourns the assembly, "Apple Daily paper" the general meeting great length reported, I thought now at last is the media should do - - the resident was understood the society political affair, is the media responsibility. Moreover "Apple" in the editorial, to 64 events fair appraisals, very many very is all touching, also it may be said surges the will of the people. How "is Eastern Daily" also? This year 64 next day, I will cross the entire share East, all will see "64" two characters! I am moved almost fall down the tear to come, I did not understand such an authority specialized also shoulders the social responsibility the media organization, why has to treat the reader like this which Yu Ch'it'ou trusts! This forces out the opinion with the inland the procedure to have what distinction! Therefore, I may boldly draw such conclusion: Hong Kong indeed has very many newspapers not to be all incredible. Not only "the East" so, "Grand duke", "Article Collects", "Business Newspaper" also is so. Luckily, is not the complete newspapers also is so. "Apple" the standpoint is a little extreme, reported once in a while exaggerates; But its objective and the ideal frontage, said in at present still was may to as soon as read. "Ming Daily" 令譽 the long time, to fairly saw by the standpoint stated that, should be also credible. Also has some other, even slightly not completely record.

反而，《蘋果日報》的立場也同樣鮮明──然而我相信這是正面的。每逢遊行、悼念集會，《蘋果日報》總會大篇幅報道，我覺得這才是傳媒應做的──令市民去瞭解社會政治事務，是傳媒的責任。而且《蘋果》社論中，對六四事件的公正評價，很多都很感人，且可謂激盪人心。
　　《東方日報》又是如何？今年六四翌日，我翻過整份東方，都見不到「六四」二字！我傷感得差點掉下淚來，我不明白這麼一間權威專業且背負社會責任的傳媒機構，為何要這樣對待於其投以信任的讀者！這跟內地封殺言論的做法有何分別！
　　因此，我可以大膽地作出這樣的結論：香港的確有很多報章都不可信。不但《東方》如此，《大公》、《文匯》、《商報》也是如此。
　　幸好，不是全部的報章也是如此。《蘋果》立場有點偏激，報道又間或誇張；不過其宗旨與理想正面，在目前而言仍是可以一讀。《明報》令譽已久，向以立場公正見稱，應該也是可信的。還有一些其他的，恕未盡錄。 的英文是:

Instead, the standpoint similarly is also bright - - however I to believe this is positive. Every time brings forth the parade, mourns the assembly, the general meeting great length reported, I thought now at last is the media should do - - the resident was understood the society political affair, is the media responsibility. Moreover "Apple" in the editorial, to 64 events fair appraisals, very many very is all touching, also it may be said surges the will of the people. How "is

also? This year 64 next day, I will cross the entire share East, all will see "64" two characters! I am moved almost fall down the tear to come, I did not understand such an authority specialized also shoulders the social responsibility the media organization, why has to treat the reader like this which Yu Ch'it9;ou trusts! This forces out the opinion with the inland the procedure to have what distinction!

Therefore, I may boldly draw such conclusion: Hong Kong indeed has very many newspapers not to be all incredible. Not only so,

Lckilyoheomplete newspapers also is so. the standpoint is a little extreme, reported once in a while exaggerates; But its objective and the ideal frontage, said in at present still was may to as soon as read. "Ming Daily" the long time, to fairly saw by the standpoint stated that, should be also credible. Also has some other, even slightly not completely record