how can people just ignore the doubts the facts and evidence??

Can I quote these secular scientist who are speaking from their sandy head abodes?

The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primordial soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence. - Sir Fredrick Hoyle, Nature Nov. 1981

When it comes to the origins of life there are only two possibilities: Creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved hundreds of years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible. That life arose from spontaneous chance. - George Wald, "The Origin of Life", Scientific American May 1954

Genes and enzymes are linked together in a living cell--two interlocking systems, each supporting the other. It is difficult to see how either could manage alone. Yet if we are to avoid invoking either a Creator of a very large improbability, we must accept that one occured before the other in the origin of life. But which one was it? We are left with an ancient riddle: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? - Robert Shapiro

To produce this miracle of molecular construction all the cell need do is to string together the amino acids (which make up the polypeptide chain) in the correct order. This is a complicated biochemical process, a molecular assembly line, using instructions in the form of a nucleic acid tape (the so-called messenger RNA). Here we need only ask, how many possible proteins are there? If a particular amino acid sequence was selected by chance, how rare of an event would that be? This is an easy exercise in combinatorials. Suppose the chain is about two hundred amino acids long; this is, if anything, rather less than the average length of proteins of all types. Since we have just twenty possibilities at each place, the number of possibilities is twenty multiplied by itself some two hundred times. This is conveniently written 20 [to the] 200[power], that is a one followed by 260 zeros. This number is quite beyond our everyday comprehension.." Francis Crick, Life Itself, Its Origin and Nature 1981, pp 51-52

The development of the metabolic system, which, as the primordial soup thinned, must have "learned" to mobilize chemical potential and to synthesize the cellular components, poses Herculean problems. So also does the emergence of the selectively permeable membrane without which there can be no viable cell. But the major problem is the origin of the genetic code and of its translation mechanism. Indeed, instead of a problem it ought rather to be called a riddle. The code is meaningless unless translated. The modern cell's translating machinery consists of at least fifty macromolecular components which are themselves coded in DNA: the code cannot be translated otherwise than by products of translation. It is the modern expression of omne vivum ex ovo [everything that lives, (comes) from an egg]. When and how did this circle become closed? It is exceedingly difficult to imagine. - Jacques Monod, Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology 1971 pp.142-143


________________________

Concluding remarks:

This debate about evolution is far from being purely unbiased science. To remove it from the realm of extreme subjectivity, math has to be the deciding factor. As you can see from the few quotes above, the math does not favor Darwin.

_________________________

Albert Einstein: "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind."

Stephen Hawking (British astrophysicist): "Then we shall… be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we would know the mind of God."

Roger Penrose (mathematician and author): "I would say the universe has a purpose. It's not there just somehow by chance."

Wernher von Braun (Pioneer rocket engineer) "I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science."

I have many more quotes. I love to collect them and read what powerful minds have to say and how they feel about God.

Jesus lives.

Yes, we are one of millions of species on earth. God created all species because he chose to. Man was given dominance over all the animals. Surely you won't dispute that. And as far as us going extinct, who knows? That would be . . . the rest of the story.

Many of them were told that there IS no evidence. And then they avoid any attempt by anyone to tell them otherwise. And thus they can keep their heads in the sand.

Because of all the errors and gaps in evolution!

http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/evolprob.html

It could be for a host of reasons, Possibly they have looked into the evidence concerning evolution and found it less than concrete and absolute as some say. It is possible that some have been indoctrinated to the point their minds are closed to any aspect of evolution as truth. It is possible that they have knowledge or experience beyond the 'real or solid' world that science deals with. It could be they have beliefs in things that exist beyond things that can be 'tested'; love for example can not be proved to exist scientifically, but is there any doubt that it does exist? This could go on for many pages... just a few thoughts...

How can you ignore the facts and evidence? There is plenty of evidence to prove that there is a God, and that He loves YOU personally, and wants you to know Him. Why do you continue to ignore Him? Why do you not seek the Creator, so that you can understand just how important you are to Him? You are a treasure to Him- more valuable than all the gold in all the earth, more valuable than you can even begin to comprehend. He loves you so much that He came to die in your place, taking the punishment that you deserve, so that He could then give you abundant life.

Oh that you could just catch a glimpse of the Father's love for you. You would never go back to thinking of yourself as an unimportant monkey byproduct. You would understand the delight that God has in you, and the yearning desire that He has to know you, and to bless you. Oh, won't you please, look upon Jesus? Look full on His wonderful face.

I don't know about that. Once we learned how to split the atom, the clock has been ticking for the life of the entire planet, because even if the human race dies out, these missile silos will still be around. Like landmines in Laos.

Way to go Schneb!!!!!! Also if you want to know some really great stuff about dinosaurs...check out Dr. Dino...you may be surprised to learn that 'dinosaurs' are still alive and well today=) hhuummmm now what would evolutionists say about that!!

Speak for yourself. I am important.

Because they have faith so they do not need to think.

Evolution, like Intelligent Design, still remains a theory. There are no facts, just hypotheses.

Humans are omnivorous, and as such are not going to be dying out any time soon, b/c our diets are so versatile.

People like to hang on to what they know. Change from the status quo is frightening for the majority of the human race. Be careful you aren't criticizing others of this while being guilty of it yourself.