核能最適合興建在哪裡

最適合興建在資金充足的地方(沿海)
沿海的資金多
工廠多
電力需求大
發展核能能夠減緩電力緊張的局面

Advantages of nuclear power plants against other mainstream energy resources are:
No greenhouse gas emissions (during normal operation) - greenhouse gases are emitted only when the Emergency Diesel Generators are tested (the processes of uranium mining and of building and decommissioning power stations produce relatively small amounts)Does not pollute the air - zero production of dangerous and polluting gases such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, aerosols, mercury, nitrogen oxides, particulates or photochemical smogSmall solid waste generation (during normal operation)Low fuel costs - because so little fuel is neededLarge fuel reserves - (e.g., in Canada and Australia) again, because so little fuel is neededNuclear Batteries - (see SSTAR) Disadvantages include:
Risk of major accidents - an example of the worst possible situation is what happened to Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (which did not have a conventional containment building)Nuclear waste - high level radioactive waste produced can remain dangerous for thousands of years if not reprocessed.Plutonium produced from nuclear reactions can be used to make nuclear bombs, aiding nuclear proliferation (see Magnox)High initial costsHigh energy inputs during construction (equivalent to ~7 years power output)High maintenance costsSecurity concernsHigh cost of decommissioning plantsThermal pollution (although all conventional power plants emit thermal pollution) Nuclear power is highly controversial, enough so that the building of new commercial nuclear power plants has ceased—at least temporarily—in the U.S. and most of Western Europe. (As of 2006, new nuclear power plants are under construction in several Asian countries, as well as in Argentina, Russia, Finland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, and Romania. In the U.S., a consortium of six major companies is planning construction of a new nuclear power plant, which would be the first since the 1970s.) [3], [6], [7] Almost all the advantages and disadvantages of commercial nuclear power are disputed in some degree by the advocates for and against nuclear power.
The cost benefits of nuclear power are also in dispute. It is generally agreed that the capital costs of nuclear power are high and the cost of the necessary fuel is low compared to other fuel sources. Proponents claim that nuclear power has low running costs, opponents claim that the numerous safety systems required significantly increased running costs.
Disposal of spent fuel and other nuclear waste is claimed by some as an advantage of nuclear power, claiming that the waste is small in quantity compared to that generated by competing technologies, and the cost of disposal small compared to the value of the power produced. Others list it as a disadvantage, claiming that the environment cannot be adequately protected from the risk of future leakages from long-term storage.

現有的核能發電技術大都是通過核聚變過程產生大量熱能，把水加熱成蒸氣，推動鍋輪發電機組產生熱力。

根據朗肯循環( Rankine Cycle )定律，核聚變過程產生的熱能只有小部分能把水加熱，其他多餘熱能便變成廢熱，需要迅速排走，否則大量熱能積聚可導致核心熔解做成核災難。

迅速排走大量熱能莫過於使用水。所以核電廠一定會建於水源附近，方便排走廢熱；而水源必須穩定，不受自然因素影響水量供應，海水必然穩定過河水了。

所以核電廠大多建於海岸，而其他核能設施亦只會用於海中，如核潛艇和核母艦等。

核能最適合興建在遠離市區、近水源的地方及地震帶。
好處:1.一旦洩漏幅射，也不會有大量人民死亡
2.核電廠不會被地震破壞
3.有冷卻用水使用

核能最適合興建在遠離市區又近水源的地方。好處是一但洩漏幅射，也不會有大量人民死亡，而且還可以冷卻。