幫忙中譯英

Babel Fish Translation Help

In English:
On the other hand, has allocated funds 將令 the welfare service according to the commercial principle operation, is extremely disadvantageous to the proletariat populace. Looked from the government and the welfare activity relations that, two will start the partner relations by the 70's which will form to be able to deteriorate: The government will use to compete will throw the method which the contract, price low resulted in to lease out the welfare service, the government formerly plans, the gauge tube welfare service role can desalinate. The government and the organization relations turn the pure business relations. Machine the conception obtains the service to set up the power, needs to try to find solution to pull down the cost of operation, including pulls down staff's wages treatment. Looked from the organization itself operation principle that, after funds the amount to place an upper limit on, the organization will face the very big financial pressure, the organization manager originally uses for to plan active, the contact service user's operating time, will be going to use for to do everything possible the development source of wealth. The charge which the most direct method naturally is uses "the customer from to pay", "takes back cost" the reason increase moves and serves. Recently began a government's subsidized the old age dementia patient nursed the center, the daily lodgings spent unexpectedly reach as high as 500 Yuan! This kind of change, will be able to make the high income person to be easier to accept the service, pays the money the low income society group actually to get rid of Zhu Menwai. The welfare service from presses the person to need to provide turns provides according to person's ability to pay. In brief, the welfare service completely turns a business, the entrance writes "richly only then is having the service".

On the other hand, allocating the funds all at once will cause the welfare services to operate according to commercial principles, and this is extremely disadvantageous to the public.

Looking at the relationship between the government and social welfare organizations, their partner relationship that started from the 1970s’ will change. The government will be leasing out welfare services in the way of auction contracts, and whoever suggests the lowest operating cost would get to sign the contract. Therefore, the government’s role in planning and regulating welfare services in the past will fade away. Their relationship would become a purely business relationship. And if organizations wanted to conduct certain welfare services, they would need to find ways to lower the operating cost, including reducing the wages and benefits of their staff.

Looking, at the organizations’ own operating principles, as the organizations’ subsidizations would be limited, it will be facing great financial pressure, and the directors would be using the time for planning activities and contacting service-users to think of ways to develop financial support. The most direct way is to, of course, cite the reasons of “customers pay for their own services” and “taking back operating costs” and increase the charges of their services and activities. For example, a newly opened, government-sponsored care center for elderly Alzheimer’s disease patients charges 500 dollars per lodging day! This kind of changes would cause people with high or medium income to accept the services more easily, but the crowd of low-incomers in our society would be forced out of their doors. Welfare services had changed from being provided according to people’s needs into according to people’s financial status. As you can see, welfare services has completely turned into a type of business, where “we provide services if you have money” is written on their doors.