請高手幫忙翻譯 - 中譯英 (20分)

Under an allocation system, the government has provided a fixed subsidization amount to the organization, the substitution now the subsidization pattern which is reimbursed for actual expenses according to the organization actual need. But funds the amount the staff disburses the part then forever freezes in the organization wage level table median (e.g. a welfare work, according to firewood level table salary is by seventh to 17th, under new system government only can give welfare 12th salary). Moreover, after the new system implements, the government could not again look like formerly stipulated the organization internal manpower establishment and the staff salary, the organization might decide freely.
At present the entire port probably has 27500 subsidization organization staff, including official ranks and so on social worker, welfare work, nurse, driver, chef, workshop teacher, daily life attendance, housework assistant and general affairs. Carries out an allocation system, the subsidization organization staff definitely has borne the brunt. The subsidization amount already placed an upper limit on, but the staff period of service year by year increased progressively actually, the organization staff wages expenditure was increasingly big, this will cause the very big pecuniary embarrassment to the organization. If requests the government in the welfare activity three years to reduce 5% expenditure the resources increment plan computation, the organization insufficient will reach as high as 5,200,000. Why can have the insufficiency? Because the subsidization amount freeze is invariable. How the organization does deal with several million insufficient? By now, even if the organization management level did not would rather also must think of a way on the staff body.

2007-02-09 14:25:21 補充：
我遲尐有時間再幫你譯過, 呢個比住你參考先

英文:
Under an allocation system, the government has provided a fixed subsidization amount to the organization, the substitution now the subsidization pattern which is reimbursed for actual expenses according to the organization actual need. But funds the amount the staff disburses the part then forever freezes in the organization wage level table median (e.g. a welfare work, according to firewood level table salary is by seventh to 17th, under new system government only can give welfare 12th salary). Moreover, after the new system implements, the government could not again look like formerly stipulated the organization internal manpower establishment and the staff salary, the organization might decide freely.
At present the entire port probably has 27500 subsidization organization staff, including official ranks and so on social worker, welfare work, nurse, driver, chef, workshop teacher, daily life attendance, housework assistant and general affairs. Carries out an allocation system, the subsidization organization staff definitely has borne the brunt. The subsidization amount already placed an upper limit on, but the staff period of service year by year increased progressively actually, the organization staff wages expenditure was increasingly big, this will cause the very big pecuniary embarrassment to the organization. If requests the government in the welfare activity three years to reduce 5% expenditure the resources increment plan computation, the organization insufficient will reach as high as 5,200,000. Why can have the insufficiency? Because the subsidization amount freeze is invariable. How the organization does deal with several million insufficient? By now, even if the organization management level did not would rather also must think of a way on the staff body.
中文:
在一筆過撥款制度下，政府將向機構提供一筆固定的資助金額，取代現時按機構實際需要的實報實銷的資助模式。而資助金額的員工支出部份則永遠凍結在機構員工薪級表的中位數上（例如一名福利工作員，根據薪級表薪酬是由第七點至第十七點，新制度下政府只會給福利員第十二點薪酬）。而且，新制度實行後，政府不會再像以往規定機構內部的人手編制和員工薪酬，機構可自由決定。
目前全港大約有27500名資助機構員工，包括社工、福利工作員、護士、司機、廚師、工場導師、起居照顧員、家務助理員和庶務員等職級。推行一筆過撥款制度，資助機構員工肯定首當其衝。資助金額已經封頂，但員工年資卻逐年遞增，機構員工工資開支愈來愈大，這將對機構造成很大的財政困難。如果把政府要求福利機構三年內削減5%開支的資源增值計劃計算在內，機構不敷將高達520萬。為什麼會有不敷？因為資助金額凍結不變。機構怎樣應付幾百萬的不敷呢？這時，機構管理層即使不情願也要在員工身上打主意。