關於兀的問題.......

👨🏻‍🏫 學術台數學

欣娌

2007-02-03 1:11 am

請給我兀的最精確，我淨係知3.14159265358979咋.........比多d我

回答 (4)

Andrew

2007-02-05 1:06 am

✔ 最佳答案

這裏有一個程式可以找pi 準確到1,000,000位，但要15小時才知結果。

http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/CRHpi.asp

問題是，你真的要1,000,000位嗎?

PI 是一個超越數，就是說，除了不可能寫成分數以外，也不可能寫成任何多項式的根，所以是沒有最精確的小數顯示式，只可以說是比較精確的小數顯示式。

👍 0 👎 0

豬

2007-02-03 1:31 am

3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609

👍 0 👎 0

用戶3944

2007-02-03 1:18 am

兀是一個循環小數...
最精確的是3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679
8214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196
4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273
72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160...

參考: 數學老師

👍 0 👎 0

【☆﹏☆】

2007-02-03 1:17 am

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679
8214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196
4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273
724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609...

2007-02-02 17:17:43 補充：
連住

2007-02-04 20:19:39 補充：
第2個回答者的數字位,我多了佢1個位,哈哈!

參考: http://3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592.com/

👍 0 👎 0

收錄日期: 2021-04-13 14:43:52
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070202000051KK01897

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份