JAZZ vs POLO

2007-02-02 11:37 pm
請問JAZZ 好D 定係POLO好D?
大家都係2004年。

回答 (3)

2007-02-03 1:51 am
✔ 最佳答案
Of course JAZZ 好D!Here are some informations about two kinds of Honda Jazz.
Jazz Modulo:
Jazz最近推出了多款不同的包圍配搭,內櫳布局則維持原來的實用、簡潔路線,而且不乏跑感元素,就以屬於05年新版的Jazz Modulo為例,便配上三幅式跑車環、扭掣式冷氣溫度調校、220km/h刻度冷光儀表板和本田無段變速波棍槽等。 整套Modulo包圍組件共有五大件,分別是前傾形跑化頭泵把、兩側低矮裙腳、擾流尾泵把和頂置式小型鴨尾翼。此外,為配合這套醒目的Modulo大包圍,更追加了運動化電鍍排氣喉嘴,令整體視覺效果更趨一致。今代本田Jazz定位為實用家庭小房車,因此在原來的外形設計上較有保留,以照顧主流的家庭用家,但對年輕車迷而言,難免有美中不足之感。在順應民意的情況下,代理最近引入一款運動氣息濃厚的Jazz Modulo,配上一身原廠改裝的新包圍,感覺生動了許多。 Jazz Modulo的引擎維持原來規格,仍以慳油見稱的1,339c.c.直四引擎擔綱,在直接雙重點火系統輔助下,最大馬力輸出為86ps,峰值扭力12.1kgm在2,800rpm悉數輸出,對應個子小、車重輕的Jazz來說,表現出段段有力的特性,而暢順的無段變速自動波箱亦能緊密合作,使行車更見流暢從容。

本田Jazz Modulo規格表
車  型:五門五座位揭背房車
引  擎:直四SHOC八氣閥i-DSI
容  積:1,339c.c.
最大馬力:86ps/5,700rpm
最大扭力:12.1kgm/2,800rpm
驅  動:前置引擎、前輪驅動
傳  動:無段變速自動波
懸  掛:(前)麥花臣支柱、(後)扭力桿
制  動:(前)透氣碟、(後)鼓
輪  胎:175/65R14


Jazz Mugen:
取名為Jazz Mugen的特別版本,主要改動落在車身上。車頭方面,鬼面罩換上Mugen的網紋款式,別具辣味,中央位置則鑲有Mugen的徽章,表明身份,而前泵把上設有多個網紋入風口,加強動感程度。泵把下方加設頭唇,令車頭部分更趨貼地,也帶來立體化的效果。泵把兩旁則有一對前置霧燈,除可加強照明能力,也令Jazz的賣相更見神氣。 車側方面,裙腳組件用上旋扭式設計,不慍不火地將線條豐富起來。此外,側鏡前方和尾門都貼上Mugen Sport車身貼紙,作用就與車頭的Mugen徽章一樣。尾泵把下方設有一個凸出的位置,遠觀與車底擾流相似,加上排氣喉上增設的喉套,將Mugen的活力感覺貫徹至車尾的細微部分。 性能方面,Jazz Mugen維持原來的格局,由1,339c.c.直四引擎負責,配合直接雙重點火系統,最大馬力和扭力分別是86ps/5,700rpm和12.1kgm/2,800rpm,以1.3公升小汽車來說已見不俗,而耗油量低更是其最大優點,必可得到香港用家的認同。

試車路線由九龍灣出發,以飛鵝山為目標,途中經過「長命斜」,Jazz的扭力表現應付自如,韌力十足,而無段變速波箱的運作也很流暢,未有突兀的情況出現,令人增加好感。 Jazz Mugen屬於二○○五年新車型號,車廂多個部分,包括中控台、儀表板和環都換上新款式,中控台的冷氣系統改以液晶顯示,分外清晰,儀表板的刻度也更加易讀,三幅式真皮環賣相高檔外,手感也討好得多。前、後座椅空間處於合理水平,頭頂的活動空間最為充裕。實用性方面,Jazz的尾箱裝載空間也足以應付小家庭的一般需要,若然減少載客量,後座大可放平,以擴充行李容量,空間大小足以放下一張三座位的梳化。

本田Jazz Mugen規格表
車型:五門五座位RV
引擎:直四SOHC八氣閥
容積:1,339c.c.
最大馬力:86ps/5,700rpm
最大扭力:12.1kgm/2,800rpm
驅動:前置引擎、前輪驅動
傳動:無段變速自動波
懸掛:(前)麥花臣支柱 (後)扭桿式
制動:(前)透氣碟 (後)鼓
車身體積:3,830×1,675×1,525mm(長×闊×高)
軸距:2,450mm
輪胎:185/55R15
售價:$138,880
查詢:2380 2231/2827 8622
參考: my car knowledge
2011-01-10 12:03 am
先驗車 後落訂

最近有很多朋友在未驗車前便落訂,但當驗車後發 現車有問題。想取回訂就非常困難!因在簽合約時,賣方 通常會說:放心!如水浸,大撞,積木車會退訂,買家在聽賣 家這樣說都很放心!其實問題就在水浸、大撞、積木車, 這三個名詞。大家試想全世界有誰能夠為這三個名詞定 義!往往驗完車,明明駁陣,紅過火、有焊接,賣家都堅 持是小事!老實講:不是受到嚴重撞,又怎會要維修?賣 家會說:你話積木車,又沒駁頭、又沒駁尾!
2007-02-06 4:35 am
i will use the question as my reference:
http://hk.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=7006110302907&others=1
http://hk.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=7006080802365
As a polo driver, i will suggest you to buy a polo playa, due to the car is better in engine, material, design, safety, space!
Jazz is cheaper, and fuel saving, but the power is less, space is little, features are cheap! Think about it, would you want a german car or a japanese car!
I drives a polo 1.6!
Honda Jazz is well-known for its fuel economy, if you have a chance to read through some local car magazines, Jazz has won quite a few of recognitions of having the lowest fuel consumption gasoline engines (excluding hybrid cars like the Toyota Prius). The interior is stylish and modern, which reminisce a typical Japanese car.

What you would expect from Volkswagen Polo is its European craftmanship. The car has a very strong frame so inevitably gross weight is heavier. If you listen closely to the sound of closing the doors on the Jazz versus that of the Polo, you'll see what I mean. European cars are very rigid, and don't expect the light-feeling steering from the Jazz. The Polo gives you a very safe feeling, it makes you feel comfortably protected when you're sitting inside of it. Driveability is great and delivers true European vehicle performance as it has firm suspension and chassis. The interior is tidy, practical, no more no less. What you need is there. You won't find any extra gadget or funny buttons on the Polo. Of course, styling-wise, Jazz is a bit better. But VW Polo comparatively delivers a more masculine image.

In my opinion, i will take the Polo!
Polo for safety and Jazz for practical!

2007-02-05 20:38:51 補充:
2004 polo looks a little bit girlish, if you are a girl, it will play right, but if you are a man jazz will do better a job!
參考: i m an automobile engineer worked in Hyundai


收錄日期: 2021-04-12 18:38:20
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070202000051KK01491

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份