For my friend, fakeandfailure

2007-01-03 3:14 pm
Check our Dr. Thomas Leung 梁燕城博士, a Christian philosopher
http://www.crrs.org/intro/intro1.htm

Any other Christians would like to provide my friend with an answer regarding to philosophy vs. Christianity or philosophers vs. Christians?
(So many M.Phil. & Ph.D. in the world I do not believe that only a couple of them are Christians!!)
更新1:

The Bible says when ppl seek, God answers. It's our turn to contribute to the Kingdom and glorify God brothers and sisters! Let's show the world that not all Christians are ignorant, stupid, unintelligent and stubborn, or so-called 盲基.

更新2:

One thing to point out... I did not name a so-called 權威人士 for fakeandfailure because I do not believe that academic or other kinds of achievement of a particular individual can support or deny Christianity or God.

更新3:

Dr. Leung is still an ordinary man regardless of the acheivement so we do not need to take his studies or other accomplishments or even his personal life like he is God (like he has to be perfect and such). Do not idolize anyone or anything.

更新4:

http://hk.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=7006122302183 http://hk.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=7006122302279 Thanks Anthony and patonking. This question is an extension of the two questions above. Fakeandfailure was trying to get people to think critically and so do I!

更新5:

Anthony if you have time would you please read the article fakeandfailure posted? I do not know who 勞思光教授 is but I cannot agree with him at all. Do u see anything wrong or any problem with his premise of the article? The argument is unbelievably weak to me.

更新6:

Paton I totally agree with u that the more educated ppl are not necessarily the more critical thinkers. That’s why although I do not agree with most of the thing u say, I am really grateful to see people like u & fakeandfailure who are motivated to think. Honestly, I do not like to see 盲基 too.

更新7:

I personally would love to be able to type Chinese but I dont know how, plus I express better in English (I am raised in Canada) that’s why I am stuck with English; it has nothing to do with my 學歷. I only have a brief understanding of Daoism and Daode Jing so I have no comment regarding to玄天上帝.

回答 (2)

2007-01-03 7:52 pm
✔ 最佳答案
樓主,我不知你同fakeandfailure兄有什麼討論,但就算現在有些
博士教授是信耶神那又如何,這不代表耶神就是什麼來那.

我記得以前日本奧姆真理教都有很多信徒是高學歷人仕,他們有
的更用數十萬日圓買教主的洗腳水,用來醫病祈福.
可見受過高深教育絕不是能理性思考的保証.而且讀書越多,一些
顯淺的道理反而看不出,一些教育程度一般的人有時更靈活聰明.
當然,請你不要以為我是在老作,這是我的人生經驗所証明.
我知道樓主你也是一個高學歷人仕(看你的英文水平就知啦!),請你
想一想你身邊同學和教授是否個個是真有智慧,還是只得假聰明吧!

不過講番你果個梁燕城博士,我記得上年在亞視看過他主持的基督教
節目,好似是<思雨之聲>吧,我記得他把中國遠古就敬信的玄天上帝和
耶神相題而論,意圖把耶神說成根本就是中國人古代就已有的信仰,
借此把耶教和中國文化合理化.

其實對道家的<道德經>稍有認識的都知,玄天上帝是一個自然神,[道可道,
非常道.名可名,非常名.][無為而無所不為],而參考耶經,可知耶神又殺人,
又放火,又叫人做這些,又叫人做那些,完全是一個人格化的神,根本不符合
[無為而無所不為].可見兩者不通.

但梁博士無理由不知這些吧!可見我以上所說也絕不是無道理吧!
2007-01-03 7:29 pm
Science challenges and religion sometimes not able to cross track.
As well, philosophical studies are shown in a strong link with social behavior, which, in a large extend, is a scientific study.
I personally do not agree that it is an appropriate way to ‘force’ religion to link with science researches.

Psychological impact for a person to brief in an idealolistic happening does not yield a ‘prove’. No matter how hard scholars and wise men try to explain, there will be holes, still, waiting to be filled. It is nice to see human being trying hard to search for answers, but we have to accept and believe there are philosophical thoughts cannot be explained at this moment of time. This may be the major different between realistic happening before our human eyes versus spiritual believes going on in our brain.

Christians or Catholics or any followers of any other religion are basically following the same track, we do whole heartedly trust what we believe. These beliefs are shown on our day-to-day language, action, behavior, and interaction with others. If we are doing the right thing, acting the correct way, speaking the appropriate words, influencing others (both non-believers and the society) positively, which we have a strong back up (God and bible), don't you think these are much stronger prove than the trillion words from philosophers?

The key to open up a person's mind still always stay within the person himself/herself. In order for people to believe, seeing is to believe. Right?

Welcome to discuss.

Anthony
參考: Personal thoughts


收錄日期: 2021-04-23 19:47:19
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070103000051KK00598

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份