他，是反基嗎?看看誰敢再小看反基?

認為這人說得怎樣? Ambiguous, vague

RE: 以「神權」為最高主宰，以「皈神」為最後歸宿，這一定導生出否定現世，
甚至否定文化的態度。Totally disagree. One can be Christian musician, Christian artist, Christian author... So music, fine arts, literature aren't cultures? That's crazy talk. These things are in two dimensions. No contradiction whatsoever.

Honestly, I think highly of Daoism. Does that make me a horrible Christian? I don't think so. If you think I am, who are you to judge me anyways. I know God has given every single one of us freedom. There are things that have absolute standard (like killing, cheating are wrong for sure) but there are things that we have the total freedom to make choices of (such as prefer wearing dress or pants, playing classical or modern music, loving hellokitty or not, eating rice or noodles)

How did the person define culture anyways? As long as the culture I adapted into (such as playing classical music) has nothing against the teaching of the Bible, what is wrong with that?

One thing that I want to point out is that even one famous Christian such as well-knows pastors make a claim or something, we can take their words into consideration but they are not meant to be the Truth. We do not have to agree with it, follow it, or make it into my own thoughts. Of course it is nice that they share their insights which can potentially be inspiring, but they are just normal human being like you and me and they do not have to be right all the time. It is important to know who has the authority. The only so-called 權威人士 who matters to me is Jesus Christ. That's about it.

2006-12-24 02:56:25 補充：
hahaha... speechless...ok the funny one first.RE: 有罪的人不能判人的罪Judging is beyond judging people in the court. It's more of ur attitude ok? Like IF base on what I see I consider u an idiot. It's my fault. I am judging you by comparing myself to you

2006-12-24 02:58:13 補充：
Judge in the court... we got something called LAW. Basically the judge judges based on the LAW, not his/her personal opinion.Go read Matthew 7 (the whole chapter) and check the dictionary. A word can have meaning richer than u think.

2006-12-24 04:26:46 補充：
That's why Jesus taught us not to judge...RE: 含糊是因為這篇不是大論文，但你沒好好理解而成的含糊，則不是作者的錯.........I am sorry for being mean. But here, BACK AT U~

2006-12-24 04:27:55 補充：
It's hilarious to see a comment like this. I kept seeing ppl posting comments like Christians are in denial... wherever there's contradication in the Bible ppl can't understand they would say o it's God's word and ppl may not understand blah blah blah...

2006-12-24 04:35:09 補充：
Can't blame me finding the article vague for no definition no supportWhat does 皈神 means? I thought it means believing in God.Music is important in Christianity as ppl use it as a medium to praise God. lots of old music (e.g. Gregorian chant) were written for religious purposes.

2006-12-24 04:46:40 補充：
將這一套教義作為現世生活中的某種工具 is only partly true. Even Jesus pointed out that there's fake Christians. That's just old talk.But some people do it in a certain way doesn't mean everyone is the same. There still are spiritual people who are successful in everyone's eyes.

2006-12-24 09:06:09 補充：
it sounds to me like we cannot live a life with priciples that is based on our faith in God if we live in the mainstream society. I guess some ppl like monks do believe in that but I don't. I am not gonna be a nun and I'll get married. it doesn't make me live a life without God.

2006-12-24 09:58:18 補充：
不能希望在人生中成就Christian doctors, scholars, scientists...?Why not consider the MOTIVATION behind the achievement?

coqbc2000　答你的，都很同意．

再補充一下：
１）　權威不等於全對．
２）　原罪說看法這權威好像理解錯了，如coqbc2000所說．
３）　”一是真正「皈神」，則不能成就現世的文化”這推斷出了問題．若人還是在伊甸園中，可能是對．可惜，現在是被逐出了伊甸園．在做事情為榮耀神的過程中，基督徒不是單單只為基督徒服事．很多時，更為了向未信主的人作見證，在這情況下，不可否認很多時是為了非基督徒的需要，（如答你這問題）．在這基督徒跟非基督教競逐互動的情況下，不能否定不會成就現世的文化．

1) 基督教不是凡信仰、世界觀都只限一種觀點，一個標準答案。
2) 上述的論調，若是出於非基督徒，只代表一部分非基督徒對基督教的看法，只是一種見解。
3) 若是出於基督徒，可以看出該人的聖俗二分法的神學觀點：凡事不是屬靈、便是屬世，屬靈必定好，屬世必定不好。這是較基要的看法。
4) 今日基督徒都不一定同意上一項的觀點，他們認為聖經不否定現世生命，人應熱誠投入生活；現世文化有好有壞，社會很多道德觀不一定限於基督教，社會也有壞文化 (為利是圖、不擇手段....)。
5) 所以文化不一定沒有用，這要看十么文化 (試看偉大祖國的毒疍....魚....、假奶粉....假.....的文化)，至於不信主、便做什么也沒有用，沒有 context 便很難從字面解，why？這要看作者的神學觀點，但一般來說，是叫基督徒知道自己並沒有什么了不起。
6) 皈神便與現世文化(罪)對敵？Yes and No，這要看內容，如上，現世文化有好有壞，若作者從聖俗二分的觀點，凡現世的文化都是邪惡的；另一種觀點便會是指那種((假....、毒.....)) 之類的無良文化，這種文化肯定與神為敵，也與良好市民為敵。
7) 很多人，包括教徒，不明何謂原罪。原罪不是罪，是可能犯罪的本性，這本性並不構成罪，真正行出來才是罪。
8) 基督教的權威並不代表所有基督徒。

2006-12-24 05:22:15 補充：
根据教義分析？邊種教義呀？路德派？加爾文派？自由派？基要派？ or 達明一派？人總以為自己所知的教義代表基督教的教義。西方將宗教成工具，失了意義，我同意這現象，至於基要派像本來的教義？我不同意，他們持守聖經真理的原意是好的，但用字面解經有時會出問題，尤其是用舊約的律法去証明新約的基督徒還在律法之下...etc.基要派出自加爾文神學，注重行為、教條、神的預定；而路德神學則着重精神、人的自由意志。真理不變，問題是人對真理的理解有盲點，這盲點出自人的驕傲，基和反基同樣可以驕傲，驕傲的表現是自以為是，你是否以為眾人皆醉？

2006-12-25 02:12:46 補充：
朋友，你或以為自己識晒基督教(大部分基督徒也不識晒)，基督教也不完全認為得救的人一定是信耶穌的(羅馬書ch.2便有解釋)；原罪根本不是聖經的名詞，是神學家根據聖經，對人罪性的理解而用的字眼，所以原罪的解釋在不同人都略有不同，但原罪肯定不是一個人所犯的罪，但如果你堅持以為自己對基督教的教義暸如指掌，那你啱晒 la！

2006-12-25 15:56:32 補充：
小兄弟？我雖與你道不同，但欣賞你頗有思想，想將來必有作為；但你一方面反某些權威，另方面又訴諸另一種權威，出了破綻。有些有勇無謀的年青基督徒，識些佛學皮毛，以為佛教不外如是，往佛教區踢館，情況差不多。基督教沒有佛學這么複雜，但不如你想像般簡單。很多反基者從基督教學校認識基督教道理，也頗識聖經，只為不外如是，若真的話，神學院便不必存在，更不會有博士學位了！

2006-12-25 16:02:34 補充：
我不是叫你信耶穌，人生失敗的經驗和你分享：驕傲使人目空一切，並自以為是....這使人盲目，阻礙人向前....這話適用於任何人！