✔ 最佳答案
RE: 近代的邏輯解析的哲學派系，才是真的和基督教本質上不容。
Do you know what is philosophy? Do you know the nature of philosophy? Have you taken any philosophy courses? I have. And it was very very interesting. We were trying to define what fine art is and after 4 months of serious discussion about what philosophers from Socrates to a more modern era have to say about fine art and the conclusion is "we can never have a solid definition for fine art". (which is how Dao De Jing started... Hahaha... )
Anyways, what is logical now did not have to be logical 3000 yrs ago and may not be as logical 3000 years later. What is logical in one culture does not have to be logical in another. I have taken semantics and logic is so involved but Language changes over time...
Logic and philosophy are totalIy based on human understanding towards issues; it is silly to believe that people can actually use their so-called logic to define something beyond. Religion is more than just philosophy. Theology is 哲學中的過時支派?! Really? Where is that from?
Believing man who always and only stays in the material world is capable of having a thorough understanding of the spiritual world? What is that Chinese proverb? "Frog in the bottom of a well"?
2006-12-24 09:17:25 補充：
o wow... to u 說phil是危險的... I am sorry, so what if you read a lot? how much did u actually digest and thorough understand? I read both the Analects and Daode Jing and i am sure u know how different they are, do I have to disregard one of them?
2006-12-24 09:23:46 補充：
The reason why i said religion is more than phil is because ppl can adapt themselves into the phil of a religion but disregard the component of god. Like ppl can believe there's consequences if u do bad things without acknowledging Buddha
2006-12-24 09:28:28 補充：
u were right in a sense that studying theology is pointless if you do not believe in the exsistence of God with is the core of the whole discussion. I am glad that we finally get to this main point.
2006-12-24 09:30:43 補充：
I do not think ppl can ever prove or disprove the physical exsistence of God (if they don't consider Jesus is God) because God does not belong to the physical world.
2006-12-24 09:32:19 補充：
phil itself has many schools of thougths. All these different divisions again, are from us, mankind. Phil helps us think for sure can it can't prove or disprove the exsistence of God.
2006-12-24 09:39:37 補充：
Afterall, as u said, philosophy does not provide THE very answer; we can hardly conclude. Hope this would help u to see why there's so many denominations of Christianity. On the other hand, God tells u He is the answer. Are u willing to seek from the answer?
