✔ 最佳答案
1.問題本身有問題
"讀多書唔一定搵好多錢 可能仲比少讀書既搵少左"-->固然有可能,但
"讀多書" 搵好多錢既機會仍然比 "少讀書" 既高好多好多
(講真,香港有幾多個李家誠?你睇下中環返工既人平均教育水平?)
問題本身就有誤導成份
2.話讀書為 $ 唔可以同時為其他野犯了非黑即白的謬誤
(讀書為 $ 同為知識唔係mutully - exclusive)
當然,純為理想/增加知識而讀書就呃你
但讀書既目的可以包括$$$,知識,個人修養,冇衝突
雖然 "讀了書也不一定聰明"
但"讀了書而聰明"的概然性絕對比 "不讀書而聰明"高
相反
"不讀書而不勞力工作"固然有可能
但"不讀書而要勞力工作"的可能性更大
總結 : "讀書"唔使做做勞力工作同搵$多d 既概然性(probability)比"不讀書"高
(對你條問題的回應一)
3.(回應二)
of cox,one of the aims of studying is to earn more money ( in fact it's one of the most important aimS =.=). i must be fooling you if i claim that i study not for making more money but for the pleasure of getting more knowledge...=P
however,we study not only *solely* for making money, but also for other purpose,though they may be less significant...examples may include knowing more about this world, sense of satisfaction...and training of critical thinking
there are something MORE THAN MONEY in life,or study
eg,according to Maslow's Need-hierarchy theory, there's a need to self-actualize yourself...despite the physical satisfaction...
不是說$不重要,但生命中除了$外還有其他很多重要的事,例如自我實現...這是讀書可以給你的...讀書可以令你有批判思考,諗野有logic
例如我知道你條問題有問題
可以寫 grammatical 的英文
識得maslow的theory...呢d野都係讀書俾我
因為我有讀philo同英文
後生仔
人生除了$以外仲有好多好玩既野
等緊你去搵~!