抄錯了還是字典錯?

2006-11-25 3:24 am
剛看見有位博士指出:

下面是一些所謂知識:

【英文】Value for money 中 for money 可以隨意刪掉。

value for money 當然不可沒有了for money, 只剩一個字. 但查看一網上字典則有例子如下寫法:

I thought the offer was good value (for money)/US ALSO a good value (= a lot was offered for the amount of money paid). [Cambridge]

另一是:

phrases. something that is good value or value for money is worth the money it costs. [Cobuild]

不知是不是有衝突?

回答 (3)

2006-11-25 6:30 am
✔ 最佳答案
In my own knowledge and opinion, i think that you do not need the 'for money' part because value actually means the amount of money or the cost of something, so if you still put for money after it it will be repeating the meaning of the word. the thing is that you can say the value of your life, the value of theis car, but, NB, you will seldom say the value for money.
2006-12-12 12:51 am
那被誤解/錯誤的資料已被移除了. 又希望懂得批評別人的人, 也會用同樣標準來衡量自己.
2006-11-25 3:46 am
其實個for money可以+可以唔+的,所以沒有衝突


收錄日期: 2021-05-03 12:54:41
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061124000051KK03243

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份