✔ 最佳答案
A wrote to B offering to sell a car for 50000 & promise to keep the offer for 1 week. Any contract bw A & B?
1) B replied inquiring whether A would take 45000 for the car, but no reply to this letter, wrote a further letter within the week agreeing to buy the car for 50000. but 2nd letter was lost in the post.
As a matter of principle, counter offer destroys the original offer, and the original offer is no longer capable of being accepted. However, the counter offer must be communicated to A for it to be effective. There is no information in the question to tell whether the counter offer has actually been communicated to A or not. If the counter offer was not communicated to A, the original offer would still be capable of being accepted when B changed his mind and sent out his 2nd letter.
Under the posting rule, a postal acceptance takes effect when it is posted. So even if it was lost in the post for whatever reason, there is a binding contract between A and B under which B agreed to buy and A agreed to sell a car for 50000 when B posted his second letter, provided that (a) the counter offer was not communciated to A prior to B sending out his second letter, and (b) the letter was sent within one week from the original offer, as A only promised to keep the offer for 1 week, after which the offer would have lapsed and not capable of being accepted.
2) Bf the week was over, A, without inform B, sold car to C for 48000.. B who heard from a friend A might be intending to do this, wrote within the week purporting to accept A's offer.
If A sold the car within one week of his original offer to B, then B would still be able to accept the offer and sue A for breach of contract, as the offer cannot be withdrawn by A before the end of the week.