音樂鑒賞的問題!!!

除了客觀既因素，如音色控制、音量等等外，也少不免有主觀既喜好因素在內。至於點樣去分辨，我覺得
1. 需要多聽不同演奏家的演奏
如看音樂會和CD都可以，因為自己心裡既一套美學係需要時間去Build up的，多聽了心裡就自然有個標準來分辨。
2. 多看樂評人寫既評論
當然樂評人寫既評論有時也會有他自己既個人喜好在內，咁都係要時間去分析理解，佢地既文章有時用既文字可以比較具體D寫出一些抽象既感覺，當然如果佢寫既你有聽過既話，咁可能會更有體會吧。
3. 參加音樂欣賞講座
康文署不時都有辦呢類講座，我覺得不妨去聽聽，如蕭樹勝最近就好似會有一系列既講座了，你可以去康文署個網睇下或者去大會堂拎leaflet來睇。
至於點去聽釋放感情，呢樣我覺得也是自己個人既感受。有時你覺得佢無，但我聽落可能覺得佢係用好內歛既方式；又或者你覺得佢彈到真情流露，正到無得頂，但可能我又覺得感情泛濫過於做作也未定。
我覺得一位稱職的演奏家除了具備你所寫的之外 (這是最基本的要求吧) ，還需要有一份對音樂既熱誠，因為要有這顆熱誠的心，才會為著自己的演奏努力不懈務求感動聽眾，而且如果欠缺了這顆心，他所演奏的都會變得內裡空空如也，沒有內涵，有如機器。

Music is very personal and subjective matter. No one is ever correct and no one is even wrong (well too wrong anyways). In a competition there are many factors the judges should and will consider, mainly if the player has truely understood the STYLE of the piece of music (eg. when playing Bach, can this person really play the style Bach intended or is he/she just playing in their own style that doesn't suit the music?). Some judges are musicologists, meaning they are extremely picky about the different styles, eg. Bach style, Mozart style, Phillip Glass style etc etc.
Then comes expression - this can be quite experimental by the player, as long he/she keeps the style correct. Expression is not just emotional expression but also pharsing - ie. treating the piece of music like a conversation, where you have commas and full stops. This is what gives the emotional feel to the music. So Pharsing and emotions go hand-in-hand.
Speed - well of coz one should play close to the speed that the music asked for. Never too fast - if it's too fast, then it isn't possible to hear the expressions and pharsing. If it's too slow, then it's boring! The player should make use of speed when performing and this is probably the hardest because one will no doubt be nervous on stage, you will speed up even if you don't want to!
I'm only speaking from an amature player's point of view. Any professional musicians here are welcome to correct me.