✔ 最佳答案
a) She could have protected herself only if she was forwarned. Spells also exist according to the law of will. If they wanted to kidnap her more than she wanted to not be kidnapped (multiplied by four on their side because there are four of them) then she would be powerless. Especially since she certainly didn't expect to be kidnapped and was therefore not focusing her will on not being kidnapped.
b) Many would consider that sort of revenge unethical. I myself do not. Illegal, yes, but those are two different things. I believe it is more unethical to allow a wrong to go unpunished thereby letting an evildoer run around hurting other people as well. If people do something once, and get pleasure from it, they will do it again. However, I do think she should have gone to the police as well.
c.) In some cultures she could be charged with murder, and perhaps should. However, America doesn't recognize witchcraft as a weapon and therefore she can't be. If she was in Zimbabwe, she would be. Absolutely.
d.) Nobody is really free. They will be reborn and possibly face repurcussions for their actions in their next lives. However, the idea of this kind of justice is not so much punishment is preventing further harm. You remove the evildoer, he can hurt no one else.
Also, she is not a white witch. There is no such thing. Witches just are. Unless you are referring to her ethnicity, which is irrelevant anyway. White magick and black magick are subjective. If she were employed by the community to protect them from these dangerous people, her magic would be seen as good or white. However, by the perpetrators families, her magic would be seen as bad or black.